全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

支架视角下初中英语课堂教师追问对学生语言输出的作用研究
The Effects of Teachers’ Questioning on Students’ Language Output in Middle School English Class from the Perspective of Scaffolding

DOI: 10.12677/ae.2024.1471199, PP. 545-553

Keywords: 支架教学,追问,语言输出,初中英语
Scaffolding Teaching
, Questioning, Language Output, Middle School English

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本文基于支架视角,采用课堂观察法和会话分析法,对八节初中英语课堂中教师追问的使用情况及对学生语言输出的作用进行分析。研究发现:1) 在初中英语课上,不同教师使用支架类追问存在显著差异,常用类型为标记关键位置、提高学生参与度、简化任务、要求学生提供线索;2) 支架类追问能增加学生口语输出,要求学生提供线索更能引发学生的简单句、复杂句输出,标记关键位置更能引发学生的词汇、词组输出。本文提出两点建议:教师应增强支架意识,灵活运用追问;调整追问策略,促进语言输出。
Based on the perspective of scaffolding, the author uses the classroom observation method and conversation analysis method to analyze the use of teachers’ questioning and its effects on students’ language output in 8 middle school English classes. The findings are as follows: 1) Significant differences exist in the use of scaffolding questioning by different teachers in middle school English classes and the commonly used types are marking critical features, inviting participation, reduction in degree of freedom, and inviting students to contribute clues; 2) Scaffolding questioning can increase students’ oral output. Inviting students to contribute clues can trigger students’ output of simple sentence and complex sentence, and marking critical features can trigger students’ output of vocabulary and phrase. This paper offers two suggestions: Enhance the awareness of scaffolding and flexibly use questioning; adjust the questioning strategy to promote language output.

References

[1]  Vygotsky, L. (1978) Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Harvard University.
[2]  高艳. 基于建构主义学习理论的支架式教学模式探讨[J]. 当代教育科学, 2012(19): 62-63.
[3]  王心怡, 罗晓杰. 小学英语课堂资源型支架的使用情况及其有效性分析[J]. 中小学外语教学(小学篇), 2019, 42(11): 7-13.
[4]  赵妮莎. 基于“支架”视角的英语专业课堂中教师提问的探讨[J]. 外国语文, 2012, 28(5): 133-139.
[5]  王悦. 学校教师教学方法与艺术全书[M]. 北京: 中央民族大学出版社, 1998.
[6]  刘宇慧. 大学英语师生互动过程中的话语研究[M]. 上海: 华东理工大学出版社, 2012.
[7]  Wood, D., Bruner, J.S. and Ross, G. (1976) The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
[8]  Rosenshine, B.V. and Meister, C. (1992) The Use of Scaffolds for Teaching Higher-Level Cognitive Strategies. Educational Leadership, 49, Article 26.
[9]  Roehler, L. and Cantlon, D. (1997) Scaffolding: A Powerful Tool in Social Constructivist Classrooms. In: Hogan, K. and Pressley, M., Eds., Scaffolding Student Learning, Brookline Books.
[10]  Badr, H.M. (2019) Exploring the Impact of Classroom Interactional Discourse on Preparatory Students’ Oral Production of the Target Language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 8, 178-185.
[11]  Gibbons, P. and Hammond, J. (2005) Putting Scaffolding to Work: The Contribution of Scaffolding in Articulating ESL Education. Prospect an Australian Journal of TESOL, 20, 6-30.
[12]  黄倩, 王光明. 数学课堂追问的类型及特征——基于顾沛先生对“电话计费问题”课例的点评[J]. 教育科学研究, 2015(2): 59-64.
[13]  蔡雅媚. 不同模式下地理教师课堂追问行为比较研究——以“锋与天气”为例[J]. 地理教学, 2018(16): 4-7.
[14]  Yuan, F. and Ellis, R. (2003) The Effects of Pre-Task Planning and On-Line Planning on Fluency, Complexity and Accuracy in L2 Monologic Oral Production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1-27.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.1.1
[15]  Foster, P.A. (1998) Classroom Perspective on the Negotiation of Meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 1-23.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.1.1
[16]  吴和贵. 支架式教学: 有效教学的生长点[M]. 广州: 中山大学出版社, 2013: 43.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133