|
基于具身认知理论的中小学劳动教育优化路径
|
Abstract:
劳动教育是中国特色社会主义教育体系的重要组成部分。新时代党和国家对劳动教育提出了更高的要求,将劳动教育提高至与德、智、体、美同样重要的战略高度。当前我国中小学劳动教育存在着认知偏差、身心分离、体验受阻、场景单一等现实问题。基于具身认知视角开展中小学劳动教育,积极探索中小学劳动教育的优化路径,可以更好地履行立德树人的根本任务,促进新时代中小学生全面发展与健康成长。
Labor education is an important part of the socialist education system with Chinese characteristics. In the new era, the Party and the state have put forward higher requirements for labor education, raising labor education to a strategic height as important as morality, intelligence, physique and aesthetics. At present, there are some practical problems in primary and secondary school labor education in our country, such as cognitive deviation, body-mind separation, blocked experience and single scene. Carrying out labor education in primary and secondary schools from the perspective of embodied cognition and actively exploring the optimization path of labor education in primary and secondary schools can better fulfill the fundamental task of cultivating morality and cultivating people, and promote the all-round development and healthy growth of primary and secondary school students in the new era.
[1] | 赵蒙成, 王会亭. 具身认知: 理论缘起、逻辑假设与未来路向[J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2017(2): 28-33+45. |
[2] | 叶浩生. 有关具身认知思潮的理论心理学思考[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(5): 589-598. |
[3] | 陈巍, 郭本禹. 具身-生成的认知科学: 走出“战国时代” [J]. 心理学探新, 2014, 34(2): 111-116. |
[4] | 叶浩生. 身体与学习: 具身认知及其对传统教育观的挑战[J]. 教育研究, 2015, 36(4): 104-114. |
[5] | 教育部、共青团中央、全国少工委. 关于加强中小学劳动教育的意见[EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A06/s3325/201507/t20150731_197068.html, 2024-03-14. |
[6] | 徐海娇. 劳动教育的价值危机及其出路探析[J]. 国家教育行政学院学报, 2018(10): 22-28. |
[7] | 张磊, 倪胜利. 身体视域下的劳动教育: 文化内涵、价值意蕴与实践路向[J]. 国家教育行政学院学报, 2019(10): 88-95. |
[8] | 叶浩生. 具身认知: 认知心理学的新取向[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(5): 705-710. |
[9] | 卢凤, 朱传林, 张嫡嫡, 等. 具身知觉符号理论视角下的情绪启动效应[J]. 心理学探新, 2020, 40(4): 296-301. |
[10] | 殷明, 刘电芝. 身心融合学习: 具身认知及其教育意蕴[J]. 课程·教材·教法, 2015, 35(7): 57-65. |
[11] | 叶浩生, 曾红. 镜像神经元、具身模拟与心智阅读[J]. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), 2013(4): 97-104. |
[12] | 陈斯琪. 从“身”出发: 劳动教育的逻辑起点[J]. 基础教育, 2019, 16(6): 12-18. |
[13] | 叶浩生. 身心二元论的困境与具身认知研究的兴起[J]. 心理科学, 2011, 34(4): 999-1005. |