刍议诉源治理视域下行政复议调解可诉性——基于新《行政复议法》实施周年之际
A Discussion on the Admissibility of Administrative Mediation in Administrative Review under the Perspective of Litigation Prevention and Control—Based on the First Anniversary of the Implementation of the New “Administrative Review Law”

新《行政复议法》扩大了复议调解的适用范围，为行政复议更好地发挥行政解纷的主渠道作用提供了制度支撑。然新法条文对复议调解的可诉性以及当事人在复议调解书效力瑕疵时的权利救济方式等问题未有言明，司法实践中法官也往往一刀切式地否定复议调解书的可诉性，这并不利于公民权益的保护。“张传义案”最终得到解决表明对复议调解书进行效力审查已在中国司法实践中晨光初现。通过对与复议调解可诉性相关的法条剖析，阐明行政复议调解书的效力等同于复议决定复议调解书应当被纳入行政诉讼受案范围。建议修订《行政复议法实施条例》，对复议调解可诉性以及当事人的权利救济途径等问题进行补充确认，并辅之以复议调解再审程序的构建，以期对实现行政争议实质性化解有所裨益。
The new Administrative Reconsideration Law has expanded the scope of review mediation, providing a systematic support for the main channel role of administrative review in resolving administrative disputes. However, the new law has not clearly stipulated the admissibility of review mediation in litigation, as well as the rights of parties when the effectiveness of the mediation agreement is flawed, which is not conducive to the protection of citizens’ rights. The “Zhang Chuanyi case” was eventually resolved, indicating that the review of the effectiveness of review mediation agreements has begun to emerge in China’s judicial practice. By analyzing the relevant legal provisions on the admissibility of review mediation, it is clarified that the effectiveness of review mediation agreements is equivalent to that of review decisions, and they should be included in the scope of administrative litigation. It is suggested that the implementation regulations of the Administrative Review Law be revised to supplementally confirm the admissibility of review mediation and the rights of parties for relief, and complemented by the establishment of a review mediation review procedure, in order to contribute to the substantive resolution of administrative disputes.