全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

论我国个人破产法治路径的体系构建——以四层次分析方法为视角
On the System Construction of the Legal Path of Personal Bankruptcy in China—From the Perspective of a Four-Level Analytic Approach

DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2024.127652, PP. 4569-4575

Keywords: 个人破产,破产免责,免责条件
Personal Bankruptcy
, Bankruptcy Exemption, Exemption Conditions

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

伴随我国经济增长与提升营商环境的需求,有中国特色的个人破产制度的构建成为党与政府文件重点关注之命题。2021年3月1日,《深圳经济特区个人破产条例》成为构建这一制度的破冰之举。然当前我国个人破产制度构建虽逢良机,但亦存在社会认知负面、法律规定缺乏、执行程序困难等问题。本文提出以新制度经济学代表人物奥利弗·威廉姆森的“四层次”社会科学分析框架为视角,个人破产制度构建应加强债信文化建设、起草《个人破产法》并兼顾各地实际、重点关注负债者的免责复权与恶意者的惩罚、以及在立法与司法中贯彻利益平衡方法的方式,为构建中国特色的个人破产法治路径提供助益。
With the needs of China’s economic growth and improving the business environment, the construction of a personal bankruptcy system with Chinese characteristics has become a key proposition in the documents of the Party and the government. On March 1, 2021, the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone Personal Bankruptcy Regulations became an icebreaker in the construction of this system. However, although the current construction of China’s personal bankruptcy system is a good opportunity, there are also problems such as negative social cognition, lack of legal provisions, and difficulties in enforcement procedures. Based on the “four-level” social science analysis framework of Oliver Williamson, a representative of new institutional economics, this paper proposes that the construction of personal bankruptcy system should strengthen the construction of debt and credit culture, draft the Personal Bankruptcy Law and take into account the actual situation of various places, focus on the exemption and restoration of debtors and the punishment of malicious actors, and implement the method of balancing interests in legislation and justice, so as to provide help for the construction of personal bankruptcy rule of law with Chinese characteristics.

References

[1]  刘冰. 我国个人破产免责制度的构建[J]. 法商研究, 2022(5): 88-101.
[2]  张善斌, 翟宇翔. 论我国个人破产庭外程序的体系构建[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(3): 155-167.
[3]  梁上上. 利益的层次结构与利益衡量的展开——兼评加藤一郎的利益衡量论[J]. 法学研究, 2002(1): 52-65.
[4]  彭艺璇. 习近平关于法治化营商环境重要论述的核心意涵和实践进路[J]. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2024, 44(4): 161-169+222-223.
[5]  陈坤. 论个人破产与参与分配的衔接——基于深圳地区1371件个人破产案件的实证分析[J]. 河北科技师范学院学报(社会科学版), 2023, 22(1): 87-93.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133