|
清代司法官责任制度研究
|
Abstract:
优化法官责任制度是有关司法改革的重要一环,公正的法官责任制度有助于司法实践。清代在前朝基础上建立了完善的司法官责任制度,从案件审理程序开始到审判工作结尾,规定了刑事、民事、行政的追责方式,具有责任制度类型丰富、追责方式多样、附带措施齐全的特点。清代司法官责任制度的系统性与可操作性可为当下法官责任制的革新提供启迪。
Optimizing the system of judges’ responsibility is an important part of judicial reform, and a fair system of judges’ responsibility is conducive to judicial practice. On the basis of the previous dynasty, the Qing Dynasty established a perfect system of judicial officer responsibility system, from the beginning of the trial procedure to the end of the trial work, stipulating criminal, civil and administrative accountability methods, which has the characteristics of rich types of responsibility system, diverse methods of accountability, and complete incidental measures. The systematization and operability of the judicial responsibility system in the Qing Dynasty can provide inspiration for the innovation of the current judicial responsibility system.
[1] | 江灏, 钱宗武. 今古文尚书全译[M]. 贵阳: 贵州人民出版社, 1990. |
[2] | [唐]长孙无忌, 褚遂良, 李勣, 等. 唐律疏议[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 1999. |
[3] | 李磊. 清代民事诉讼制度的特点及现代借鉴意义[J]. 广西政法管理干部学院学报, 2011, 26(5): 91-94. |
[4] | 叶云江, 崔卫军. 浅论我国刑事诉讼中口供的证据地位——兼谈我国刑事诉讼中的沉默权[J]. 前沿, 2007(2): 121-123. |
[5] | 郭涛. 清代任官制度中的回避制度[J]. 中外企业家, 2014(20): 271. |
[6] | 舒哲岚. 秦汉简牍中的“案致”——兼论汉初地方立法建议[J]. 湖南社会科学, 2020(4): 63-71. |