|
基于CADDIE模型的学习设计在混合式教学中的探索与实践
|
Abstract:
目的:研究旨在探索建构主义教学理念在高等教育中的应用,通过CADDIE模型指导学习设计,实现混合式教学改革,以培养具有创新思维和应用能力的技术人才。方法:研究基于建构主义教学理念,整合ADDIE模型的分析、设计、开发、实施和评价五个阶段,对“图像处理与应用”课程进行系统化的学习设计;改革包括线上线下混合学习、案例式教学、虚拟仿真实验等教学策略,并建立了形成性与结果性相结合的评价体系。结果:混合式教学改革显著提高了学生的参与度和学习动机,促进了学生在知识掌握、技能应用和素质培养方面的全面发展;学习设计创新和评价体系完善为教学活动提供了持续改进的依据。结论:研究验证了建构主义理念指导下的ADDIE模型(即CADDIE模型)在混合式教学改革中的有效性,为高等教育课程创新和教学改革提供了实证支持;研究结果强调了持续改进的重要性,并指出教育者应继续探索创新的教学模式和策略,以适应教育需求和技术的快速发展。
Purpose: This study aims to explore the application of constructivist teaching philosophy in higher education by utilizing the CADDIE model to guide learning design for blended learning reform. The objective is to cultivate technical talents with innovative thinking and practical capabilities. Methodology: Grounded in constructivist theory, this research integrates the five stages of the ADDIE model—analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation—to systematically design the “Image Processing and Applications” course. The reform includes teaching strategies such as blended learning, case-based teaching, and virtual simulation experiments, alongside the establishment of an integrated formative and summative evaluation system. Results: The blended learning reform significantly enhanced student engagement and motivation, promoting comprehensive development in knowledge acquisition, skill application, and quality cultivation. Innovations in learning design and the refinement of the evaluation system provided a foundation for continuous improvement in teaching activities. Conclusion: This study validates the effectiveness of the constructivist-guided ADDIE model, known as CADDIE, in blended learning reform. It offers empirical support for curriculum innovation and educational reform in higher education. The findings underscore the importance of ongoing improvement and suggest that educators should continue to explore innovative teaching models and strategies to meet the rapidly evolving demands of education and technological advancements.
[1] | Lockyer, L. and Dawson, S. (2011). Learning Designs and Learning Analytics. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Banff, 27 February-1 March 2011, 153-156. https://doi.org/10.1145/2090116.2090140 |
[2] | 王新民. 学习设计的基本内涵初探[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2016, 31(08): 91-95. |
[3] | 李锋,兰希馨,李正福等. 单元视角下的信息科技跨学科主题学习设计与实践[J]. 中国电化教育, 2023(03): 90-95. |
[4] | 陈明选,都书文,彭修香. 促进深度理解的高中数学项目化学习设计研究[J]. 电化教育研究, 2023, 44(03): 84-90. |
[5] | 沈霞娟,张宝辉,张浩. 深度混合学习设计模型的构建与实证研究[J]. 现代教育技术, 2022, 32(08): 50-58. |
[6] | Dewantara, I.P.M. and Dibia, I.K. (2021) The Principles of Blended Learning Design with Heutagogy Approach thourgh e-Ganesha Moodle in Indonesian Language Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1810, Article ID: 012048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1810/1/012048 |
[7] | 高文. 教育中的若干建构主义范型[J]. 全球教育展望, 2001, 30(10): 3-9. |
[8] | 吴影,郑晓凤. 基于建构主义的混合式外语学习环境设计[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2020(S1): 76-78. |
[9] | 徐进. 基于建构主义理论的古建筑木作实践教学改革——评《苏州传统建筑构造节点营造》[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2020(05): 133. |
[10] | 武田艳,柯翔西,颜剑锋等. 建构主义理论下“工程造价案例分析”混合式教学模式研究与实践[J]. 建筑经济, 2023, 44(S2): 484-488. |
[11] | 欧阳雪,李远蓉. 基于ADDIE模型的初中化学单元作业设计与实施研究——以“自然界的水”单元为例[J]. 化学教学, 2023(10): 78-84. |
[12] | 杨美礼. 基于ADDIE模型的分析化学课程思政探索与实践[J]. 化学教育(中英文), 2023, 44(22): 41-51 |
[13] | 沈惠娴. 基于ADDIE教学设计模型的初中地理微课设计[J]. 中学地理教学参考, 2022(02): 48-51 |
[14] | 段烨. 学习设计与课程开发[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2015. |