|
多元治理背景下的城市社区多元纠纷化解机制研究
|
Abstract:
城市社区的多元纠纷化解机制,表现为主体、手段途径与规范依据等多元性,并同时要求不同要素间的系统性整合。构建并完善城市社区的多元纠纷化解机制,不仅具有我国的文化根基,还可以缓解司法机关案件压力,同时契合当下的社区治理转型理念,具兼传统与现实价值。其旨在整合分散的社区纠纷化解力量,及时高效化解纠纷,并在社区治理中推进包容性法治理念的融合。目前的社区治理中的多元纠纷化解机制呈现出民间纠纷化解机制建设薄弱、多元主体间的互动衔接不足、多元纠纷化解规则构建滞后等弊端。在未来可以围绕强化民间纠纷化解机制、加强社区纠纷化解机制体系化构建、完善多元化的纠纷化解规则几个方面加以改进,以提升社区治理中的多元纠纷化解机制的整体水平。
The multiple dispute resolution mechanism in urban communities is characterized by the diversity of subjects, means and norms, and requires the systematic integration of different elements. Constructing and perfecting the multiple dispute resolution mechanism in urban communities not only has the cultural roots of China, but also can relieve the pressure of cases from the judiciary, and at the same time fits the current concept of transformation of community governance, with both traditional and practical values. It aims to integrate the scattered community dispute resolution forces, resolve disputes in a timely and efficient manner, and promote the integration of the concept of inclusive rule of law in community governance. Currently, the pluralistic dispute resolution mechanism in community governance shows the disadvantages of weak construction of civil dispute resolution mechanism, insufficient interaction between pluralistic subjects, and lagging behind in the construction of pluralistic dispute resolution rules. In the future, it can be improved by strengthening the civil dispute resolution mechanism, enhancing the systematic construction of the community dispute resolution mechanism, and perfecting the diversified dispute resolution rules, so as to enhance the overall level of the diversified dispute resolution mechanism in community governance.
[1] | 习近平. 决胜全面建成小康社会夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利——在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告[J].中国纪检监察, 2017(21): 6-23. |
[2] | 习近平. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[M]. 北京: 中国人民出版社, 2022: 54. |
[3] | 施雪华, 张琴. 国外治理理论对中国国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的启示[J]. 学术研究, 2014(6): 31-36. |
[4] | 李德恩. 城市化进程中的社区纠纷解决机制: 目标设定与系统优化[J]. 广西社会科学, 2012(3): 120-123. |
[5] | 瞿琨. 调解法律方法与社区纠纷解决——以情理调解方法为例[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2013(3): 89-93. |
[6] | 陈佩. 社会自治中的纠纷解决机制研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中共中央党校, 2016. |
[7] | [日]谷口平安. 程序的正义与诉讼[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1996: 45. |
[8] | 张清, 叶嘉敏. 包容性法治理念的核心要素与实践理路[J]. 扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2020, 24(3): 41-58. |
[9] | 郭翔. 社区化解民事纠纷的实践: 制度困境、认识偏差及其克服[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2013(3): 65-71. |
[10] | 施美萍, 黄燕翔. 建立健全基层社会矛盾的预警与化解机制探究——以Q市调查为样本[J]. 长春理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 28(9): 9-14. |
[11] | 张清. 基层自治制度的理论阐述与路径选择[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2020, 38(2): 45-53. |
[12] | 张何鑫. 城市社区治理中的软法研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 沈阳: 辽宁大学, 2020. |
[13] | 罗豪才, 韩春晖. 社会主义法治体系中的软法之治——访著名法学家罗豪才教授[J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2014(6): 4-9. |