|
人本–多元–混沌三位一体框架下学生心理混沌能力的教育学理论构建
|
Abstract:
随着社会环境的变化,学生的心理状态受到教育各个层面的关注。基于对学生心理健康长期性、根源性的思考,本研究借用自然科学中熵的理论,推进“心理熵增”的概念,认为学生心理问题的来源是教育中的线性系统和量化主义。本研究构建以人本主义教育学、多元智能和混沌理论三位一体的框架,培养学生的混沌能力,对抗心理熵增。研究认为,想要培养学生的混沌能力,教育系统应以人本主义教育哲学为指导,发挥教育的非功利性,关注情感需求和成长需要,培养内在驱动力。家庭则以多元智能理论为基础,尊重培养孩子能力和情感的多元,联合教育系统以多元评价促进孩子多元的自我实现,培养学生的破界互动、动态防御、多元扰动、熵增遗忘和正向创造能力。
With the change of social environment, students’ psychology will be concerned by all aspects of education. Based on the reflection of long-term and original students’ mental health, this study borrowed the theory of entropy in natural science and put forward the concept of “psychological entropy increase”, which believes that the core source of students’ psychological problems is the isolated linear system and quantitative thinking in education. This study attempts to construct a trinity framework of humanistic pedagogy, multiple intelligences and chaos theory to cultivate students’ chaos ability which could counter psychological entropy increase. According to the research, in order to cultivate students’ Chaos ability, the education system should be guided by the humanistic educational philosophy, give full play to the non-utilitarian education, pay attention to students’ emotional needs and growth needs, and cultivate students’ inner driving force. Families should respect and cultivate the pluralism of children’s abilities and emotions based on the theory of multiple intelligences, and promote the pluralism of children’s self-realization through pluralistic evaluation with the education system. From the perspective of students, it can cultivate their abilities of thinking boundary-breaking, defense transfer, chaos perturbation, entropy increase forgetting and psychological creation.
[1] | 彭振. 加强学校社会工作制度建设, 改善学生心理健康状况[J]. 中国社会工作, 2023(16): 22-24. |
[2] | 王兰兰, 侯言彬, 张加玏. 宁波市青少年学生心理健康素养、心理状况及服务需求分析[J]. 现代实用医学, 2023, 35(7): 928-933. |
[3] | 赵守盈, 刘旭华. 从耗散结构理论看心理失调与调适[J]. 系统辩证学学报, 2003(3): 83-87. |
[4] | Clausius, R. (1865) Ueber verschiedene für die Anwendung bequeme Formen der Hauptgleichungen der mechanischen W?rmetheorie. Annalen der Physik, 201, 353-400. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.18652010702 |
[5] | Prigogine, I. (1980) From Being to Becoming: Time and Complexity in Physical Sciences. W.H. Freeman and Company. |
[6] | Sawada, D. and Caley, M.T. (1985) Dissipative Structures: New Metaphors for Becoming in Education. Educational Researcher, 14, 13-19. https://doi.org/10.2307/1174574 |
[7] | Tenbrunsel, A.E., Brett, J.M., Maoz, E., et al. (1995) Dynamic and Static Work-Family Relationships. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1076 |
[8] | 秦梦群, 黄贞裕. 教育行政研究方法论[M]. 台北: 五南图书出版公司, 2014. |
[9] | 丁云龙, 王胜君. 从熵增到非均势:组织冲突的政策意蕴[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2012, 28(6): 76-81. |
[10] | 马冀, 王虹. 后现代研究方法论视域下教育活力的思维观念突破研究[J]. 创新教育研究, 2022, 10(6): 1415-1422. |
[11] | 洪洋. 基于熵增原理对加强新时代高校思想政治教育的探析[J]. 办公自动化, 2020, 25(5): 38-40. |
[12] | Dishion, T.J., Forgatch, M., Van Ryzin, M. and Winter, C. (2012) The Nonlinear Dynamics of Family Problem Solving Is Adolescence: The Predictive Validity of a peaceful resolution attractor. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 16, 331-352. |
[13] | Hirsh, J.B., Mar, R.A. and Peterson, J.B. (2012) Psychological Entropy: A Framework for Understanding Uncertainty-Related Anxiety. Psychological Review, 119, 304-320. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026767 |
[14] | Livneh, H., Rumrill, P. and Bishop, M. (2022) The Concept of Entropy within the Context of Psychosocial Adaptation Following the Onset of Chronic Illness and Disability: History and Nature of Entropy and Its Psychodynamic Implications. Medical Research Archives, 10, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v10i9.3017 |
[15] | Jia, H. and Wang, L. (2024) Introducing Entropy into Organizational Psychology: An Entropy-Based Proactive Control Model. Behavioral Sciences, 14, 54-72. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14010054 |
[16] | 陈向明. 质的研究方法与社会科学研究[M]. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2000. |
[17] | 马冀, 方禧东. 电子竞技与教育[M]. 北京: 中国财政经济出版社, 2023. |
[18] | 英起志. 警惕“信息化填鸭式”教学[J]. 湖北开放职业学院学报, 2023, 36(11): 165-166+169. |
[19] | 车文博, 黄冬梅. 美国人本主义心理学哲学基础解析[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2001(2): 2-6+19 |
[20] | 张轶妹, 曹蓉, 刘文瑞. 管理科学思想史中科学与人文的撞击及嵌合——从如何看待斯金纳与马斯洛的激励理论谈起[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2023, 45(12): 71-79. |
[21] | 罗杰斯. 患者中心治疗: 目前的实践、含义和理论[M]. 李孟潮, 李迎潮, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2013. |
[22] | 李楠楠. 罗杰斯“非指导性教学”的理论释义及启示[J]. 黑龙江教育(理论与实践), 2022(8): 41-44. |
[23] | 霍华德·加德纳. 多元智能[M]. 北京: 新华出版社, 1999. |
[24] | 孙小凯, 吴艳. 多元智能理论视域下的小学课堂教学评价研究[J]. 现代教学, 2023(21): 74-75. |
[25] | 吴梦忆. 基于多元智能理论的学生多元化评价探析[J]. 科教文汇, 2023(13): 171-174. |
[26] | 韩飞怡. 多元智能理论下融合教育差异化教学的价值意蕴和实践路径[J]. 现代特殊教育, 2023(19): 23-25. |
[27] | 马冀. 为了学生的发展而评量——实地调研开平餐饮学校的评量模式[J]. 职业教育, 2018, 7(1): 19-30. |
[28] | 人民网. 多少学校心理辅导室只在领导检查时打开? [EB/OL]. http://society.people.com.cn/n1/2023/0321/c428181-32647830.html, 2023-03-21. |
[29] | 绍兴网. 晚自习开不开? 浙江又一地发布最新政策[EB/OL]. http://www.shaoxing.com.cn/p/3157740.html, 2024-03-04. |
[30] | 钱志亮. 别用你的期望, 操纵了孩子的人生[EB/OL]. http://www.hbjyw.cn/w3g/news/detail/82425/250.html, 2018-01-03. |
[31] | 马冀. 享受过程评价乐趣, 融合语文学习团队[J]. 创新教育研究, 2017, 5(1): 45-52. |