|
具身道德视角下高校课程思政的基本理念与实践路径
|
Abstract:
全面推进高校课程思政高质量建设是落实立德树人根本任务的必然和关键。当前高校课程思政实践中仍存在一定的问题,如忽视学生真实经验、缺少实践行动、脱离现实情境等。具身道德作为思想道德教育领域的现代理论,能够为当前课程思政问题的解决提供指导。基于具身道德思想,课程思政要实现从“离身”向“具身”的转向,需要从课程目标、课程内容、课程实施和课程环境四个方面体现“经验、行动、情境”三大要素,以真正实现课程思政的入脑、入心、入行。
The comprehensive advancement of high-quality ideological and political education in university courses is essential and crucial for fulfilling the fundamental task of fostering virtue. However, there are still certain issues in current ideological and political education practices in universities, such as neglecting students’ real experiences, lacking practical actions, and disconnecting from real-life contexts. Embodied morality, as a modern theory in the field of moral education, can provide guidance for addressing these issues in current ideological and political education practices. Based on the theory of embodied morality, ideological and political education in university courses needs to shift from “detached” to “embodied”. This requires embodying the three elements of “experience, action, and context” in course objectives, content, implementation, and environment, in order to truly engage students’ minds, hearts, and actions in ideological and political education.
[1] | 陆韵. 从离身到具身: 高校课程思政理念创新与实践转型[J]. 重庆第二师范学院学报, 2023, 36(1): 87-91, 128. |
[2] | 孟万金. 具身德育: 背景、内涵、创新——一论新时代具身德育[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2017(11): 69-73. |
[3] | Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., Rosch, E. and Kabat-Zinn, J. (2017) The Embodied Mind. The MIT Press, 173. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262529365.001.0001 |
[4] | 王继瑛, 叶浩生, 苏得权. 身体动作与语义加工: 具身隐喻的视角[J]. 心理学探新, 2018, 38(1): 15-19. |
[5] | 吴言动, 喻丰, 彭凯平, 刘书青. 心真的会“软”吗? 软硬感受与语义改变道德判断[J]. 心理学探新, 2019, 39(6): 571-574. |
[6] | Zhong, C., Strejcek, B. and Sivanathan, N. (2010) A Clean Self Can Render Harsh Moral Judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 859-862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.003 |
[7] | 陈璐, 吴继霞, 万旻. 宣誓动作对大学生诚信认知和诚信感的影响[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2021, 9(5): 306-312. |
[8] | 冷洁, 吴继霞. “扪心”肢体动作抑制大学生考试作弊倾向[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2018, 391(49): 103-106. |
[9] | 叶浩生. 具身心智与具身的教育[J]. 教育研究, 2023, 44(3): 32-41. |
[10] | Hanyu, K. (2000) Visual Properties and Affective Appraisals in Residential Areas in Daylight. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 273-284. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0163 |
[11] | 周菊燕, 汝涛涛, 陈庆伟, 等. 明暗环境对道德行为的影响及其作用机制[C]//中国心理学会. 第二十一届全国心理学学术会议摘要集. 2018: 1096-1097. |
[12] | 陈潇, 江琦, 侯敏, 朱梦音. 具身道德: 道德心理学研究的新取向[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 664-672. |
[13] | 黎晓丹, 杜建政, 叶浩生. 中国礼文化的具身隐喻效应: 蜷缩的身体使人更卑微[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 746-756. |
[14] | 罗祖兵, 郭超华. 知识学习的体验属性及其教学意蕴[J]. 教育研究, 2019, 40(11): 81-90. |
[15] | 沈光银, 尹弘飚. 从“离身”到“具身”: 道德教育的应然转向[J]. 全球教育展望, 2022, 51(2): 25-38. |
[16] | 田园, 白胜超. “具身认知”理论下高校体育课程思政建设研究[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2023, 43(6): 46-49. |