|
少捕慎诉慎押刑事政策的规范适用
|
Abstract:
“少捕慎诉慎押”是党和国家的刑事司法政策,其提出顺应了我国犯罪结构日渐轻型化的要求,符合刑事司法改革深入发展、革除积弊的需要,适应我国刑事诉讼模式转型的需要。与此同时,科技手段的发展为“少捕慎诉慎押”提供了新的可能性。为了深入贯彻落实这一政策,需要厘清“少捕慎诉慎押”的基本内涵,坚持无罪推定精神和罪刑法定原则,坚持人权保障原则和比例原则,坚持恢复性司法、协商性司法理念。
“Less arrests, more prudent prosecution and more cautious detention” is the criminal justice policy of China, which is in line with the requirements of the increasing lightening of the criminal structure in China, the need for the in-depth development of the criminal justice reform, the need to eliminate the accumulated shortcomings, and the need to adapt to the transformation of the criminal procedure mode in China. At the same time, the development of scientific and technological means has provided new possibilities for “less arrests, more cautious prosecutions and more prudent detention”. In order to further implement this policy, it is necessary to clarify the basic connotation of “less arrest, prudent prosecution and prudent detention”, adhere to the spirit of presumption of innocence and the principle of legality of crime and punishment, adhere to the principle of human rights protection and the principle of proportionality, and adhere to the concept of restorative justice and consultative justice.
[1] | 庄永廉, 孙长永, 苗生明, 等. 少捕慎诉慎押刑事司法政策的内涵功能及其落实[J]. 人民检察, 2021(15): 37-44. |
[2] | 樊崇义. 检察日报: 适应犯罪生态变化 推进少捕慎诉慎押[EB/OL]. https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/llyj/202112/t20211230_540236.shtml, 2021-12-03. |
[3] | 贺恒扬. 少捕慎诉慎押刑事司法政策五大关系论纲[J]. 人民检察, 2022(3): 1-8. |
[4] | 潘金贵, 唐昕驰. 少捕慎诉慎押刑事司法政策研究[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2022, 24(1): 38-48. |
[5] | 孙长永. 少捕慎诉慎押刑事司法政策与人身强制措施制度的完善[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2022(2): 108-131. |
[6] | 张建伟. 少捕慎诉慎押的基本内涵与适用准则[J]. 人民检察, 2022(15): 6-10. |
[7] | [意]切萨雷?贝卡利亚. 论犯罪与刑罚[M]. 黄风, 译. 北京: 中国大百科全书出版社, 1993: 31. |
[8] | 宋冰. 美国与德国的司法制度及司法程序[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1998: 384. |