Background: Studies on either postnatal quality of life in general or studies that compare quality of life in new mothers after different mode of delivery are limited. An investigation on health related quality of life measures in women after different type of delivery showed that women who had vaginal delivery had better health related quality of life compared to those who had caesarean section. However, the best method of delivery, vaginal or caesarean for postpartum quality of life is a difficult question as it is a matter of controversy both from professional’s perspectives and from women’s experience during childbirth. Objective: To compare postpartum quality of life in primiparous women after vaginal delivery versus caesarean section. Methods: Prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Salmaniya medical complex in Kingdom of Bahrain. 500 primiparous women who gave birth either vaginally or by cesarean section answered a questionnaire designed to include general information, questions from short form health survey questionnaire (SF-36) and specific questions regarding postnatal related symptoms. Results: Body pain, fatigue, wound pain, headache and backache were significantly higher in cesarean section group as compared to vaginal delivery group (p-value < 0.001). Poor appetite and breast-feeding difficulty were highly observed in cesarean section group (p-value 0.001 & 0.002 respectively). Women with vaginal delivery had a significant better health outcome and ability of self-care toileting, bathing as compared to cesarean group (p-value < 0.001). Vaginal delivery group found to be more socially active and social activities were negatively affected by cesarean section. However, hemorrhoids, urinary incontinence and pain during sexual intercourse were higher in patients with vaginal delivery (p-value < 0.001). Conclusion: Cesarean delivery has negatively affected the quality of life (QOL) of primiparous women. More studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted to examine the effects of cesarean delivery on QOL in both primiparous and multiparas within a shorter period after delivery.
References
[1]
Fayers, P.M. and Machin, D. (2007) Quality of Life: The Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation of Patient-Reported Outcomes. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470024522
[2]
Steger, M.F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S. and Kaler, M. (2006) The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the Presence of and Search for Meaning in Life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80-93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
[3]
O’Connor, R. (2004) Measuring Quality of Life in Health. Churchill Livingston.
[4]
Kuyken, W., Orley, J., Power, M., Herrman, H., Schofield, H. and Murphy, B. (1995) The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Position Paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41, 1403-1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-K
[5]
Symon, A., MacDonald, A. and Ruta, D. (2002) Postnatal Quality of Life Assessment: Introducing the Mother‐Generated Index. Birth, 29, 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-536x.2002.00154.x
[6]
Torkan, B., Parsay, S., Lamyian, M., Kazemnejad, A. and Montazeri, A. (2009) Postnatal Quality of Life in Women after Normal Vaginal Delivery and Caesarean Section. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 9, Article No. 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-4
[7]
McCourt, C., Weaver, J., Statham, H., Beake, S., Gamble, J. and Creedy, D.K. (2007) Elective Cesarean Section and Decision Making: A Critical Review of the Literature. Birth, 34, 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536x.2006.00147.x
[8]
Borders, N. (2006) After the Afterbirth: A Critical Review of Postpartum Health Relative to Method of Delivery. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 51, 242-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.10.014
[9]
Thompson, J.F., Roberts, C.L., Currie, M. and Ellwood, D.A. (2002) Prevalence and Persistence of Health Problems after Childbirth: Associations with Parity and Method of Birth. Birth, 29, 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-536x.2002.00167.x
[10]
Anderson, G.M. (2004) Making Sense of Rising Caesarean Section Rates. BMJ, 329, 696-697. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7468.696
[11]
Mousavi, S.A., Mortazavi, F., Chaman, R. and Khosravi, A. (2013) Quality of Life after Cesarean and Vaginal Delivery. Oman Medical Journal, 28, 245-251. https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2013.70
[12]
Sadat, Z., Taebi, M., Saberi, F. and Kalarhoudi, M.A. (2013) The Relationship between Mode of Delivery and Postpartum Physical and Mental Health Related Quality of Life. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 18, 499-504.
[13]
Kaya, L. and Çiğdem, Z. (2019) The Relationship between Mode of Delivery and Postpartum Depression. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 8, 5. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_97_18
[14]
Majzoobi, M.M., Majzoobi, M.R., Nazari-Pouya, F., Biglari, M. and Poorolajal, J. (2014) Comparing Quality of Life in Women after Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, 2, 207-214.
[15]
AlShehri, N.M., Alanazi, A.Q., Alanazi, M.Q., Alanazi, W.Q., Alanazi, J.Q., et al. (2015) Relationship between Health Related Quality of Life Determinants and Type of Delivery in Saudi Women. Family Medicine & Medical Science Research, 4, Article ID: 1000155. https://doi.org/10.4172/2327-4972.1000155
[16]
Safarinejad, M.R., Kolahi, A.A. and Hosseini, L. (2009) The Effect of the Mode of Delivery on the Quality of Life, Sexual Function, and Sexual Satisfaction in Primiparous Women and Their Husbands. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 1645-1667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01232.x
