全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

气候变化视角下环境行政公益诉讼的优化
Optimization of Environmental Administrative Public Interest Litigation from the Perspective of Climate Change

DOI: 10.12677/ds.2024.107332, PP. 79-86

Keywords: 气候变化,气候变化诉讼,环境行政公益诉讼
Climate Change
, Climate Change Litigation, Environment Administrative Public Interest Litigation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

司法是应对气候变化的重要保障。在党二十大报告“积极稳妥推进碳达峰碳中和”和“完善公益诉讼制度”的指导下,环境行政公益诉讼在气候治理领域大放异彩。但在应对气候变化领域,我国的环境行政公益诉讼尚处于探索阶段,面临着行政机关气候监管职责不明确、缺乏“重大气候风险”防范、司法裁判执行不到位等法律障碍。为此,应以环境行政公益诉讼既有体系为基础,明晰行政机关气候监管职责,扩大行政公益诉讼范围,适当扩大行政强制执行主体,使环境行政公益诉讼可以更好地发挥防范气候风险的作用。
Justice is an important guarantee for dealing with climate change. Under the guidance of the report of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China on “Actively and prudently promoting carbon to peak carbon neutrality” and “Improving the public interest litigation system”, environmental administrative public interest litigation has flourished in the field of climate governance. However, in the field of addressing climate change, China’s environmental administrative public interest litigation is still in the exploratory stage, facing legal obstacles such as unclear climate supervision responsibilities of administrative organs, lack of “major climate risk” prevention, and inadequate judicial enforcement. Therefore, based on the existing system of environmental administrative public interest litigation, the climate supervision responsibilities of administrative organs should be clarified, the scope of administrative public interest litigation should be expanded, and the subject of administrative enforcement should be appropriately expanded, so that environmental administrative public interest litigation can better play a role in preventing climate risks.

References

[1]  李华琪. 我国气候变化诉讼的模式选择[J]. 荆楚法学, 2024(2): 126-135.
[2]  秦天宝. 整体系统观下实现碳达峰碳中和目标的法治保障[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2022, 40(2): 101-112.
[3]  张海荣, 方印, 吴羽纶. 我国环境治理的法律模式选择: 硬法和软法优化组合[J]. 福建行政学院学报, 2017(4): 36-43.
[4]  王灿发, 刘哲. 论我国应对气候变化立法模式的选择[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2015(6): 113-121+161.
[5]  曾德明. “双碳”目标下气候变化诉讼的路径选择[J]. 行政与法, 2024(1): 27-39.
[6]  曹辰. 预防性环境民事公益诉讼“重大风险”的认定与适用[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2022, 44(5): 687-693.
[7]  韩康宁, 冷罗生. 预防性司法视角下气候变化诉讼的中国范式——兼谈与环境公益诉讼的关系[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 25(5): 119-130.
[8]  庞新燕. 环境行政公益诉讼执行制度之探究[J]. 环境保护, 2019, 47(16): 51-55.
[9]  夏云娇, 朱张丹. 环境行政公益诉讼履行判决的检视及其完善[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2021(10): 131-138.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133