|
|
基于成长型思维的高中英语问题链设计
|
Abstract:
当前高中生成长型思维有所欠缺，高中英语教师问题链使用效果差强人意，基于成长型思维设计高中英语问题链能够针对性地解决这两个问题。在层次性、系统性和启发性原则的指引下，本研究将强化学习目标、引导正确归因、提升努力信念以及锻炼心理韧性融入高中英语问题链设计，由此提出相应的问题链设计策略，并形成基于成长型思维的问题链设计框架。将基于成长型思维的高中英语问题链设计应用于实践，能够培养并提升学生的成长型思维，从而促进学生学业水平的提高。
Nowadays, growth mindset of high school students is deficient and the situation of question chain use in high school English teachers is unsatisfied. So the question chain design based on growth mindset can help solve these two problems. Under the guidance of the principles of hierarchy, systematicness and enlightening, the study integrates reinforcement of learning goals, guiding correct attribution, improving belief in effort and training mental toughness into the design of question chain in senior high school English, then the corresponding strategies of question chain design are proposed and a framework of question chain design based on growth mindset is formed. The application of the question chain design based on growth mindset in high school English can cultivate and enhance students’ growth mindset, thus promoting the improvement of students’ academic level.
| [1] | Dweck, C. (2006) Mindest: The New Psychology of Success. Random House Publishing Group, 15-16. |
| [2] | Dweck, C.S. and Yeager, D.S. (2019) Mindsets: A View from Two Eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, 481-496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618804166 |
| [3] | Molden, D.C., Plaks, J.E. and Dweck, C.S. (2006) “Meaningful” Social Inferences: Effects of Implicit Theories on Inferential Processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 738-752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.11.005 |
| [4] | 顾诗燕. 基于深度学习的初中物理问题链设计研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2022. |
| [5] | 孙艳梅. 指向成长型思维的高中生物学问题链设计与实践研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 辽宁师范大学, 2023. |
| [6] | Elliott, E.S. and Dweck, C.S. (1988) Goals: An Approach to Motivation and Achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5 |
| [7] | Hong, Y., Chiu, C., Dweck, C.S., Lin, D.M. and Wan, W. (1999) Implicit Theories, Attributions, and Coping: A Meaning System Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588-599. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588 |
| [8] | Leggett, E.L. (1986) Individual Differences in Effort/Ability Inference Rules and Goals: Implications for Causal Judgments. Abstracts International, 47, 2662. |
| [9] | Miele, D.B. and Molden, D.C. (2010) Naive Theories of Intelligence and the Role of Processing Fluency in Perceived Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 535-557. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019745 |
| [10] | Miele, D.B., Son, L.K. and Metcalfe, J. (2013) Children’s Naive Theories of Intelligence Influence Their Metacognitive Judgments. Child Development, 84, 1879-1886. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12101 |
| [11] | 中华人民共和国教育部. 普通高中英语课程标准(2017年版2020年修订) [M]. 北京: 人民大学出版社, 2020. |
