全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

老年人侵权下的养老机构责任
Liability of Elderly Care Institutions under the Tort of Old Age

DOI: 10.12677/ar.2024.113140, PP. 1035-1041

Keywords: 养老机构,老年人侵权,违约责任,委托监护,安全保障义务
Elderly Care Institutions
, Tort of the Elderly, Breach of Contract, Entrusted Guardianship, Duty of Safety and Security

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

入住养老机构的老年人侵害他人权益时,若受害人与养老机构之间存在养老服务合同关系,则受害人有权请求养老机构承担违约责任。若养老机构明知或应知不完全民事行为能力的老年人具有侵害他人权益的倾向,而与其监护人签订养老服务合同或继续提供养老服务,则应当对受害人承担受托监护人的侵权责任。最高法发布的典型案例认为受害人有权请求养老机构承担法定安全保障责任。但,养老机构难谓“公共场所经营者、管理者或者群众性活动的组织者”,而且,即使养老机构不承担赔偿责任,受害人仍有权主张加害老年人或其监护人承担赔偿责任,对养老机构课以法定安全保障责任的正当性和必要性似有不足。
Suppose an older person living in a nursing home infringes on the rights and interests of another person. In that case, the victim has the right to request that the nursing home be held liable for breach of contract if there is a contractual relationship between the victim and the nursing home. Suppose the institution knows or should know that an older person with incomplete civil capacity has the tendency to infringe on the rights and interests of others and concludes an elderly service contract with his/her guardian or continues to provide elderly service. In that case, the institution shall be liable to the victim for the tort liability of a fiduciary guardian. The Supreme Court issued a typical case in which the victim has the right to request the elderly care organization to assume the responsibility of statutory safety and security. However, as elderly care institutions can hardly be described as “operators, managers or organizers of mass events in public places”, and the victim still has the right to claim that the aggrieved elderly person or his or her guardian be held liable for damages even if the elderly care institution is not liable for damages, the legitimacy and necessity of imposing a statutory safety and security responsibility on elderly care institutions appears to be insufficient.

References

[1]  韩世远. 合同法总论[M]. 第4版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2018: 342-343.
[2]  于永宁. 责任竞合视角下养老机构入居合同免责条款的法律规制[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2014(4): 27.
[3]  曹险峰, 程奕翔. 因违约而生之精神损害的救济路径——以《民法典》第996条的功能分析为中心[J]. 北方法学, 2022(3): 17-18.
[4]  周友军. 德国法监督义务人责任制度及其借鉴[J], 私法研究, 2009, 7(1): 64-65.
[5]  [德]福克斯. 侵权责任法[M]. 齐晓琨, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2006: 180.
[6]  徐银波. 养老机构人身损害赔偿责任之过错认定[J]. 法学研究, 2023, 45(1): 38-54.
[7]  吕姝洁. 论养老机构侵权的注意义务及赔偿责任[J]. 法律适用, 2017(21): 1335-143.
[8]  杨代雄. 袖珍民法典评注[M]. 北京: 中国民主法制出版社, 2022: 1057-1058.
[9]  孙文灿. 养老机构侵权责任研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017(4): 86-87.
[10]  [德]卡尔?拉伦茨. 法学方法论[M]. 第6版. 黄家镇, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2020: 341-342.
[11]  吴香香. 请求权基础——方法、体系与实例[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2021: 29-30.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133