|
全球稀土贸易网络结构特征演化及影响因素分析
|
Abstract:
稀土在战略新兴产业的发展中起着不可或缺的作用,是推动全球经济结构调整和国民经济高质量发展的关键战略性资源。本文基于社会网络分析法和QAP回归方法用2004~2022年全球稀土贸易数据从整体和个体两个层面探究了全球稀土贸易网络结构特征的演化过程并对其影响因素进行了分析。研究发现:中国是世界上最大的稀土进口国,稀土进口额远超别的国家,出口额也在整体呈上升趋势;全球稀土矿贸易网络的贸易联系趋于紧密,具有较高的集团性,呈现出小世界网络特征;核心国家相对固定,存在“核心–边缘”结构,德国、美国、中国等国家为核心国家,中国影响力在逐步提升,但还是具有“卡脖子”风险;全球稀土矿贸易网络社团结构分化逐渐由稀疏到紧密,以美国为主的社团逐渐占据垄断地位,而以中国为主的社团国家数量近两年出现了较大的下降;经济组织关系和外交关系因素对稀土贸易存在显著的正向影响,经济发展水平差异和专利差异因素有一定的正向影响,而殖民关系因素对稀土贸易没有显著影响,地理距离差异会对稀土贸易产生一定抑制作用。研究结果为我国稀土贸易战略方案制订有一定的政策启示。
Rare earth plays an indispensable role in the development of strategic emerging industries and is a key strategic resource for promoting global economic restructuring and high-quality development of the national economy. Based on social network analysis and QAP regression method, this paper uses the global rare earth trade data from 2004 to 2022 to explore the evolution process of global rare earth trade network structure and analyze its influencing factors from both the overall and individual levels. The results show that: China is the world's largest importer of rare earth, the amount of rare earth imports far exceeds other countries, and the export value is also on the rise; The global rare earth ore trade network tends to have close trade links, and has a high collectivity, showing the characteristics of small-world network. The core countries are relatively fixed and have a “core-periphery” structure, with Germany, the United States, China and other countries as the core countries. China’s influence is gradually increasing, but it still has the risk of “jamming”; The community structure of the global rare earth ore trade network gradually diverged from sparse to close, and the community dominated by the United States gradually occupied a monopoly position, while the number of community countries dominated by China showed a large decline in the past two years. The factors of economic organization and diplomatic relations have a significant positive impact on rare earth trade, and the factors of economic development level and patent difference have a certain positive impact, while the factors of colonial relations have no significant impact on rare earth trade, and the geographical distance difference will have a certain inhibitory effect on rare earth trade. The research results have some policy implications for the formulation of China’s rare earth trade strategy.
[1] | 吴一丁, 彭子龙, 赖丹, 等. 稀土产业链全球格局现状、趋势预判及应对战略研究[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(2): 255-264. |
[2] | 朱学红, 彭婷, 谌金宇. 战略性关键金属贸易网络特征及其对产业结构升级的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(8): 1489-1503. |
[3] | 都振芳. 全国稀土工作会议及稀土展销会筹备会议[J]. 稀土, 1986(4): 76-77. |
[4] | 胡前. 第二次全国稀土工作会议召开[J]. 稀土, 1990(1): 71. |
[5] | 吴一丁, 赖丹. 稀土资源税: 现存问题与改革取向——来自南方稀土行业的调研[J]. 江西理工大学学报, 2012, 33(2): 25-29. |
[6] | Gao, F.P., Zhang, P., Liu, D.C., et al. (2019) The Rare Earths Global Market Updates and the Rare Earths Industry Master Plan of the United States and Its Allies. Journal of International Trade, No. 7, 63-81. |
[7] | 苏利平, 高爽. 改革开放四十年以来稀土产业政策演进历程与启示展望[J]. 中国矿业, 2021, 30(5): 20-26+35. |
[8] | 周美静, 黄健柏, 邵留国, 等. 中国稀土政策演进逻辑与优化调整方向[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(8): 1527-1539. |
[9] | Chen, Z., Hu, Z. and Li, K. (2021) The Spillover Effect of Trade Policy along the Value Chain: Evidence from China’s Rare Earth-Related Sectors. The World Economy, 44, 3550-3582. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13172 |
[10] | 朱学红, 张宏伟, 李心媛. 中国稀土国际市场势力测度及政策有效性研究[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2018(1): 32-44. |
[11] | 边璐, 宫鹤晋, 刘子琴. 贸易摩擦对稀土市场价格的影响——基于市场有效性检验[J]. 北方金融, 2021(6): 47-52. |
[12] | 王媛. “双碳”背景下稀土资源税从价计征改革的效果分析[J]. 稀土, 2021, 42(6): 146-154. |
[13] | 孙菁靖, 雷玉桃. 中国稀土市场供需非均衡性分析与预警[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(5): 860-871. |
[14] | 李期. 基于PLS-SEM模型的中国稀土贸易安全影响因素分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 赣州: 江西理工大学, 2023. |
[15] | 李嘉豪. 基于产业链视角的全球稀土贸易网络结构演变及影响机制研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2023. |
[16] | 徐水太, 马彩薇, 朱文兴. “一带一路”稀土贸易网络结构及演化研究[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2022, 30(2): 196-208. |
[17] | 赵德海, 贾晓琳. 中国与“一带一路”沿线国家进口贸易格局及其发展潜力分析[J]. 商业研究, 2020(9): 52-59. |