全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

TransPRK、SMILE及FS-LASIK术后早期角膜光密度的对比研究
Comparison of Early Postoperative Corneal Densitometry Changes in TransPRK, SMILE, and FS-LASIK for Myopia Patients

DOI: 10.12677/hjo.2024.132007, PP. 41-53

Keywords: 角膜光密度,经上皮准分子激光屈光性角膜切除术,飞秒激光制瓣联合准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术,飞秒激光辅助的小切口微透镜取出术
Corneal Densitometry (CD)
, Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (TransPRK), Femtosecond-Assisted Laser in-Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE)

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:对比TransPRK、SMILE、FS-LASIK术后早期患者角膜光密度变化。方法:回顾性对照研究,收集2020年1月至2023年6月205名行近视激光手术的患者右眼资料(TransPRK 76眼、SMILE 66眼、FS-LASIK 63眼),包括术前、术后1月及3月用Pentacam测角膜光密度(corneal densitometry, CD),使用重复测量方差分析对比三个不同层次(前、中、后层)、三个直径范围(0~2 mm、2~6 mm及6~10 mm) CD值差异。结果:TransPRK组术后1月比较术前的角膜前层2~6 mm及中层0~2 mm范围CD值增加(p均<0.001),且中层0~2 mm范围CD高于FS-LASIK组(p = 0.012),术后3月相较术前的角膜中、后层的0~2 mm、2~6 mm范围的CD均增加(p均<0.01),此时中层0~2 mm范围CD高于其他两手术组(p均<0.01),后层0~2 mm范围CD高于FS-LASIK组(p = 0.025)。SMILE组术后1月相较术前,前层2~6 mm范围及中层0~2 mm、2~6 mm范围CD增加(p均<0.05)。FS-LASIK组术后3月前层全范围及中层2~6 mm范围CD均增加(p均<0.05)。结论:TransPRK对角膜中层0~2 mm CD影响显著,需加强术后早期管理。角膜中层0~2 mm CD值可作为观察术后角膜透明度改变的敏感指标。
Objective: To compare the changes in corneal densitometry (CD) in patients following TransPRK, SMILE, and FS-LASIK surgeries in the early postoperative period. Methods: A retrospective controlled study was conducted to collect data from the right eyes of 205 patients who underwent refractive laser surgery from January 2020 to June 2023, including 76 eyes for TransPRK, 66 eyes for SMILE, and 63 eyes for FS-LASIK. Pentacam was used to measure corneal densitometry (CD) preoperatively, one month postoperatively, and three months postoperatively. Repeated measures analysis of variance was applied to compare the differences in CD values across three different layers (anterior, middle, and posterior) and three diameter ranges (0~2 mm, 2~6 mm, and 6~10 mm).Results: In the TransPRK group, there was a significant increase in CD values in the anterior layer (2~6 mm) and middle layer (0~2 mm) one month postoperatively compared to preoperative values (both p < 0.001). Additionally, the CD in the middle layer (0~2 mm) was higher than that in the FS-LASIK group (p = 0.012). At three months postoperatively, the CD values in the middle and posterior layers (0~2 mm and 2~6 mm) were significantly increased compared to preoperative values (both p < 0.01). Notably, the CD in the middle layer (0~2 mm) was higher than that in the other two surgical groups (both p < 0.01), and the CD in the posterior layer (0~2 mm) was higher than that in the FS-LASIK group (p = 0.025). In the SMILE group, there was an increase in CD values in the anterior layer (2~6 mm) and middle layer (0~2 mm and 2~6 mm) one month postoperatively compared to preoperative values (all p < 0.05). In the FS-LASIK group, there was a significant increase in CD values in the full range of the anterior layer and the middle layer (2~6 mm) three months postoperatively (all p < 0.05).Conclusion: TransPRK has a significant impact on the CD in the middle layer (0~2 mm)

References

[1]  Ní Dhubhghaill, S., Rozema, J.J., Jongenelen, S., Ruiz Hidalgo, I., Zakaria, N. and Tassignon, M. (2014) Normative Values for Corneal Densitometry Analysis by Scheimpflug Optical Assessment. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, 55, 162-168.
https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-13236
[2]  Shah, K., Eghrari, A.O., Vanner, E.A., O’Brien, T.P. and Koo, E.H. (2021) Scheimpflug Corneal Densitometry Values and Severity of Guttae in Relation to Visual Acuity in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy. Cornea, 41, 692-698.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000002762
[3]  Mounir, A., Awny, I., Yousef, H. and Mostafa, E. (2023) Distribution of Corneal Densitometry in Different Grades of Keratoconus. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 71, 830-836.
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_1792_22
[4]  Wei, S., Li, J., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Cai, Y., Du, J., et al. (2022) Corneal Densitometry in Bilateral Keratoconus Patients with Unilateral Corneal Vogt’s Striae: A Contralateral Eye Study. International Ophthalmology, 43, 885-897.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02491-3
[5]  El Zarif, M., Alió del Barrio, J.L., Mingo, D., A Jawad, K. and Alió, J.L. (2022) Corneal Stromal Densitometry Evolution in a Clinical Model of Cellular Therapy for Advanced Keratoconus. Cornea, 42, 332-343.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000003152
[6]  Hsieh, T., Yu, H., Yang, I., Ho, R., Hsiao, Y., Fang, P., et al. (2021) Simultaneously Monitoring Whole Corneal Injury with Corneal Optical Density and Thickness in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery. Diagnostics, 11, Article 1639.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091639
[7]  Zhao, J., Yang, W., Zhao, J., Shen, Y., Sun, L., Han, T., et al. (2021) A Four-Year Observation of Corneal Densitometry after Implantable Collamer Lens V4c Implantation. Annals of Translational Medicine, 9, 536-536.
https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-6628
[8]  Zhang, Y.E., Ouzzani, M., Wright, C. and Sorbara, L. (2023) Changes in Corneal Thickness, Corneal Volume, and Densitometry after Long-Term Orthokeratology Wear. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, 46, 101703.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2022.101703
[9]  Wei, R., Li, M., Yang, W., Shen, Y., Zhao, Y., Fu, D., et al. (2020) Corneal Densitometry after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK): 5-Year Prospective Comparative Study. Frontiers in Medicine, 7, Article 521078.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.521078
[10]  Cai, W., Liu, L., Li, M., Shi, Y., Sun, L., Ma, X., et al. (2023) Comparison of Corneal Densitometry and Visual Quality after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) and Laser Epithelial Keratomileusis (LASEK): One-Year Comparative Study. BioMed Research International, 2023, Article ID: 3430742.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3430742
[11]  Savini, G., Huang, J., Lombardo, M., Serrao, S., Schiano-Lomoriello, D., Venanzio, S., et al. (2016) Objective Monitoring of Corneal Backward Light Scattering after Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Lasik. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 32, 20-25.
https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20151207-08
[12]  Charpentier, S., Keilani, C., Maréchal, M., Friang, C., De Faria, A., Froussart-Maille, F., et al. (2021) Corneal Haze Post Photorefractive Keratectomy. Journal Fran?ais dOphtalmologie, 44, 1425-1438.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2021.05.006
[13]  Poyales, F., Garzón, N., Mendicute, J., Illarramendi, I., Caro, P., Já?ez, O., et al. (2017) Corneal Densitometry after Photorefractive Keratectomy, Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis, and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction. Eye, 31, 1647-1654.
https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2017.107
[14]  Kirkwood, B.J., Hendicott, P.L., Read, S.A. and Pesudovs, K. (2009) Repeatability and Validity of Lens Densitometry Measured with Scheimpflug Imaging. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 35, 1210-1215.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.03.017
[15]  Xia, L., Zhang, J., Wu, J. and Yu, K. (2016) Comparison of Corneal Biological Healing after Femtosecond LASIK and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Procedure. Current Eye Research, 41, 1202-1208.
https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2015.1107590
[16]  Ang, M., Farook, M., Htoon, H.M. and Mehta, J.S. (2020) Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Femtosecond LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction. Ophthalmology, 127, 724-730.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.006
[17]  Du, H., Zhang, B., Wang, Z. and Xiong, L. (2023) Quality of Vision after Myopic Refractive Surgeries: SMILE, FS-LASIK, and ICL. BMC Ophthalmology, 23, Article No. 291.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03045-6
[18]  Gershoni, A., Reitblat, O., Mimouni, M., Livny, E., Nahum, Y. and Bahar, I. (2020) Femtosecond Laser Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) Yields Better Results than Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (Trans-PRK) for Correction of Low to Moderate Grade Myopia. European Journal of Ophthalmology, 31, 2914-2922.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672120980346
[19]  Mohan, R.R., Hutcheon, A.E.K., Choi, R., Hong, J., Lee, J., Mohan, R.R., et al. (2003) Apoptosis, Necrosis, Proliferation, and Myofibroblast Generation in the Stroma Following LASIK and PRK. Experimental Eye Research, 76, 71-87.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-4835(02)00251-8
[20]  Ma, X.H., Li, J.H., Bi, H.S., et al. (2003) [Comparison of Corneal Wound Healing of Photorefractive Keratectomy and Laser in Situ Keratomileusis in Rabbits]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology, 39, 140-145.
[21]  Kaji, Y., Yamashita, H. and Oshika, T. (2003) Corneal Wound Healing after Excimer Laser Keratectomy. Seminars in Ophthalmology, 18, 11-16.
https://doi.org/10.1076/soph.18.1.11.14075
[22]  Spadea, L., Giammaria, D. and Trabucco, P. (2015) Corneal Wound Healing after Laser Vision Correction. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 100, 28-33.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306770
[23]  Han, T., Zhao, J., Shen, Y., Chen, Y., Tian, M. and Zhou, X. (2017) A Three-Year Observation of Corneal Backscatter after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (Smile). Journal of Refractive Surgery, 33, 377-382.
https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20170420-01
[24]  Stojanovic, A. and Nitter, T.A. (2001) Correlation between Ultraviolet Radiation Level and the Incidence of Late-Onset Corneal Haze after Photorefractive Keratectomy. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 27, 404-410.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00742-2
[25]  Al-Sharif, E.M. and Stone, D.U. (2016) Correlation between Practice Location as a Surrogate for UV Exposure and Practice Patterns to Prevent Corneal Haze after Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK). Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology, 30, 213-216.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2016.11.004
[26]  Moshirfar, M., Wang, Q., Theis, J., Porter, K.C., Stoakes, I.M., Payne, C.J., et al. (2023) Management of Corneal Haze after Photorefractive Keratectomy. Ophthalmology and Therapy, 12, 2841-2862.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00782-1
[27]  Ang, B.C.H., Yap, S.C., Toh, Z.H., Lim, E.W.L., Tan, M.M.H., Nah, G.K.M., et al. (2020) Refractive Outcomes, Corneal Haze and Endothelial Cell Loss after Myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy in an Asian Population: The Singapore Armed Forces’ Experience. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 48, 558-568.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.13759
[28]  Thomas, K.E., Brunstetter, T., Rogers, S. and Sheridan, M.V. (2008) Astigmatism: Risk Factor for Postoperative Corneal Haze in Conventional Myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 34, 2068-2072.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.08.026
[29]  Kaiserman, I., Sadi, N., Mimouni, M., Sela, T., Munzer, G. and Levartovsky, S. (2017) Corneal Breakthrough Haze after Photorefractive Keratectomy with Mitomycin C: Incidence and Risk Factors. Cornea, 36, 961-966.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000001231
[30]  Autrata, R. and Rehurek, J. (2003) Laser-Assisted Subepithelial Keratectomy and Photorefractive Keratectomy for the Correction of Hyperopia: Results of a 2-Year Follow-Up. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 29, 2105-2114.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00415-2
[31]  Shajari, M., Wanner, E., Rusev, V., Mir Mohi Sefat, S., Mayer, W.J., Kohnen, T., et al. (2018) Corneal Densitometry after Femtosecond Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (Fs-LASIK) and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE). Current Eye Research, 43, 605-610.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2018.1431288
[32]  Dong, Z., Zhou, X., Wu, J., Zhang, Z., Li, T., Zhou, Z., et al. (2013) Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) and Femtosecond Laser LASIK: Comparison of Corneal Wound Healing and Inflammation. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 98, 263-269.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303415
[33]  M?ller-Pedersen, T., Cavanagh, H.D., Petroll, W.M. and Jester, J.V. (1998) Neutralizing Antibody to TGFβ Modulates Stromal Fibrosis but Not Regression of Photoablative Effect Following PRK. Current Eye Research, 17, 736-747.
https://doi.org/10.1076/ceyr.17.7.736.5163

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133