全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

论马一浮的圣人观
On Ma Yifu’s View of Saints

DOI: 10.12677/cnc.2024.123076, PP. 480-485

Keywords: 马一浮,圣人,六艺论
Ma Yifu
, Saints, Six Artistic Theories

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

圣人可学而至的道理历来都被儒家奉为圭臬,作为国学大师,马一浮的一生都把复兴传统儒学作为自己的追求,并在弘扬中华传统儒学的过程中时常提及圣人之道。基于马一浮的儒佛思想的造诣,其圣人观中不免充斥着佛学意味,在沿袭传统儒学圣人观的基础之上加以佛学思想的阐释,致使其圣人观颇有特色。马一浮指出,圣人之道的关键在于明白“性德自足”的道理,成圣之方的根本则在于心体上用功。圣人与凡人的差距不在原性之别而在是否能破除习气,专注内心修养,最终到达人伦之至、万物一身的圣人之境。马一浮圣人观的心学路径在一定程度上推动了主体自我意识觉醒的进程,认为只有个体之德性圆满,方可成己又成物。
The truth that saints can be learned has always been regarded as the guiding principle by Confucianism. As a master of nationalism, Ma Yifu has taken the revival of traditional Confucianism as his own pursuit in his life, and has often referred to the way of saints in the process of promoting traditional Chinese Confucianism. Based on Ma’s attainments in Confucianism and Buddhism, his view of sainthood is full of Buddhist implications, and his view of sainthood is quite distinctive due to the interpretation of Buddhist ideas on the basis of the traditional Confucian view of sainthood. Ma Yifu pointed out that the key to the way of sainthood lies in understanding the truth of “self-sufficiency of nature and virtue”, and the root of the way to sainthood lies in the work on the mind and body. The difference between saints and mortals is not in their original nature, but in whether they can break their habits and focus on inner cultivation, so that they can finally reach the state of saints, who are the best of all human relationships and the best of all things. To a certain extent, Ma Yi-fu’s saintly view of the path of teleology promotes the process of the subject’s self-consciousness awakening, believing that only when an individual’s virtue is perfected can he or she become self-conscious and become all things.

References

[1]  马一浮, 著; 吴光, 主编. 马一浮全集(第一册上) [M]. 杭州: 浙江古籍出版社, 2012.
[2]  马一浮, 著; 吴光, 主编. 马一浮全集(第二册下) [M]. 杭州: 浙江古籍出版社, 2012.
[3]  丁福保, 编. 佛学大辞典[M]. 上海: 上海书店出版, 1991.
[4]  冯契, 徐孝通, 主编. 外国哲学大辞典[M]. 上海: 上海辞书出版社, 2000.
[5]  李景林. 从论才三章看孟子的性善论[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(6): 117-123.
[6]  方克立, 李锦全, 主编. 新儒学学案(第一册) [M]. 上海: 中国社会科学出版社, 1990.
[7]  马一浮, 著; 吴光, 主编. 马一浮全集(第一册下). 杭州: 浙江古籍出版社, 2012.
[8]  方旭东. 为圣人祛魅——王阳明圣人阐释的“非神话化”特征[J]. 中国哲学史, 2000(2):83-92.
[9]  马一浮, 著; 吴光, 主编. 马一浮全集(第四册). 杭州: 浙江古籍出版社, 2012.
[10]  马一浮, 著; 吴光, 主编. 马一浮全集(第二册上). 杭州: 浙江古籍出版社, 2012.
[11]  汤可敬. 说文解字今译(增订本) [M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2013.
[12]  朱晓鹏. 论马一浮对六艺论儒学的重建[J]. 杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 43(5): 9-25.
[13]  罗义俊. “从习气中解放出来”——马一浮儒学的系统性格及其旨要[J]. 杭州师范学院学报(社会科学版), 2007(4): 1-9.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133