全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

论洛克自然法理论中的财产权概念
On the Concept of Property Rights in John Locke’s Theory of Natural Law

DOI: 10.12677/acpp.2024.136177, PP. 1184-1189

Keywords: 洛克,施特劳斯,自然权利,财产权
John Locke
, Leo Strauss, Natural Rights, Property Rights

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

作为现代自然法理论的杰出代表之一,洛克常被视作古典自然法传统的正统继承者。然而在列奥·施特劳斯看来,洛克所继承的并非古典自然法传统,而是霍布斯的自然法理论。隐藏在洛克自然法理论之下的哲学基础不是古典自然正当理论,而是霍布斯所开创的现代自然权利理论。通过对洛克自然法理论中最具特色的财产权理论与其高明的修辞术的考察,这一观点可以得到确证。
As one of the outstanding representatives of modern natural law theory, John Locke is often regarded as the orthodox successor of the classical natural law tradition. However, in the view of Leo Strauss, Locke inherited not the classical natural law tradition, but Hobbes’s theory of natural law. The philosophical foundation hidden under Locke’s theory of natural law is not the classical theory of natural right, but the modern theory of natural rights initiated by Hobbes. This view can be confirmed through an examination of Locke’s clever rhetoric and the most distinctive theory of property rights in his theory of natural law.

References

[1]  Snyder, D.C. (1986) Locke on Natural Law and Property Rights. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 16, 723-750.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1986.10717145
[2]  Mazurek, M. (2017) Greed and Piety—Political Reason in the Philosophy of John Locke. Polish Journal of Political Science, 3, 159-179.
[3]  洛克. 政府论(下篇) [M]. 叶启芳, 瞿菊农, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1964.
[4]  Locke, J. (1823) The Works of John Locke (Vol. 4). Thomas Tegg, London.
[5]  列奥·施特劳斯. 自然权利与历史[M]. 彭刚, 译. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2016.
[6]  洛克. 人类理解论[M]. 关文运, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1959.
[7]  吴允通, 王新生. 洛克的个体危机及其自然法起源[J]. 哲学分析, 2019, 10(6): 70-78+192.
[8]  王晓朝. 论古希腊节制观念的源起与节欲论的生成[J]. 学术研究, 2023(12): 33-39+177.
[9]  亚里士多德. 尼各马可伦理学[M]. 廖申白, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2003.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133