|
Nursing Science 2024
社区老年高血压患者电子健康素养现状及影响因素分析
|
Abstract:
目的:调查社区老年高血压患者电子健康素养现状并分析其影响因素。方法:采用随机数字表法于2023年10月~2024年3月选取贵阳市主城区2个社区卫生服务中心中符合纳入标准的老年高血压患者为调查对象,应用一般资料问卷、电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)对其进行问卷调查,并对数据进行分析。结果:研究最终获得有效问卷280份。社区老年高血压患者电子健康素养量表总分为(20.83 ± 6.62)分。单因素方差显示,不同性别、年龄、与子女居住情况、文化程度、家庭月收入、职业、上网频率、互联网使用年限、网络健康信息搜寻经历及获取互联网健康信息渠道的社区老年高血压患者电子健康素养得分差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。多元线性回归分析结果显示,年龄、文化程度、互联网使用年限、网络健康信息搜寻经历和获取互联网健康信息渠道是老社区老年高血压患者电子健康素养的影响因素(β = 0.016、0.04、0.003、0.034,均P < 0.05),可解释电子健康素养总变异的73.7%。结论:社区老年高血压患者电子健康素养受多方面因素影响,目前处于较低水平。社区卫生服务工作者应重视社区老年高血压患者电子健康素养水平的提升,积极开展有针对性的干预措施提高患者电子健康素养水平,从而提升其生存质量。
Objective: To investigate the current status of e-health literacy among community-dwelling elderly hypertensive patients and analyze its influencing factors. Methods: From October 2023 to March 2024, elderly hypertensive patients meeting the inclusion criteria in 2 community health service centers in the main urban area of Guiyang City were selected as the investigation objects by random number table method. General data questionnaire and Chinese Electronic Health Literacy Scale (eHEALS) were used to conduct a questionnaire survey, and the data were analyzed. Results: 280 valid questionnaires were obtained. The total score of electronic health literacy scale for elderly hypertension patients in community was (20.83 ± 6.62). Univariate variance showed that there were statistically significant differences in e-health literacy scores of elderly hypertension patients in communities with different gender, age, living conditions with children, educational level, monthly family income, occupation, Internet frequency, Internet use years, Internet health information search experience and access to Internet health information channels (all P < 0.05). The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that age, educational level, Internet service years, Internet health information search experience and access to Internet health information channels were the influential factors of e-health literacy of elderly hypertension patients in old communities (β = 0.016, 0.04, 0.003, 0.034, all P < 0.05). It explained 73.7% of the total variation in e-health literacy. Conclusion: The e-health literacy of elderly hypertension patients in community is affected by many factors and is at a low level at present. Community health service workers should pay attention to the improvement of e-health literacy level of elderly hypertension patients in the community, and actively carry out targeted intervention measures to improve the e-health literacy level of patients, so
[1] | 中国心血管健康与疾病报告编写组. 中国心血管健康与疾病报告2019概要[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2020, 35(9): 833-854. |
[2] | 中国老年医学学会高血压分会, 国家老年疾病临床医学研究中心中国老年心血管病防治联盟. 中国老年高血压管理指南2019[J]. 中华高血压杂志, 2019, 27(2): 111-135. |
[3] | “十四五”健康老龄化明确9项任务[J]. 江苏卫生保健, 2022(5): 55. |
[4] | 徐晓华, 刘睿艳, 林颖. 电子健康素养对慢性心力衰竭患者症状负担的作用路径研究[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2020, 37(12): 14-17. |
[5] | 迟晨汝, 周志庆, 刘欢, 等. 老年慢性病住院患者服药依从性现状及影响因素研究[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2024, 40(3): 60-64. |
[6] | 蒋自程, 李德勋, 刘欢, 等. 基于ICCC框架的互联网慢性病管理问题与对策[J]. 济宁医学院学报, 2023, 46(6): 430-435. |
[7] | 滕智裕, 陶美伊, 郭晨曦, 等. 长沙地区冠心病患者电子健康素养与自我健康管理行为的相关性分析[J]. 湖南师范大学学报(医学版), 2023, 20(3): 164-168. |
[8] | 曹丰, 陈鲁原, 陈伟伟, 等. 中国老年高血压管理指南2023[J]. 中华高血压志, 2023, 31(6): 508-538. |
[9] | Landry, K.E. (2015) Using eHealth to Improve Health Literacy among the Patient Population. Creative Nursing, 21, 53-57. https://doi.org/10.1891/1078-4535.21.1.53 |
[10] | 郭帅军, 余小鸣, 孙玉颖, 等. eHEALS健康素养量表的汉化及适用性探索[J]. 中国健康教育, 2013, 29(2): 106-108, 123. |
[11] | 孟舒娴, 沈冲. 南京某高校大学生电子健康素养及行为现状调查[J]. 中国健康教育, 2018, 34(3): 254-257. |
[12] | 刘珍, 张晗, 张艳, 等. 郑州市农村老年人电子健康素养现状及影响因素分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2020, 47(2): 283-286, 309. |
[13] | 熊蔚蔚, 郭菁, 李凤强. 老年慢性病患者安全用药行为现状及影响因素[J]. 中国卫生工程学, 2023, 22(6): 794-796. https://doi.org/10.19937/j.issn.1671-4199.2023.06.023 |
[14] | 程爱萍, 张聪. 糖尿病个人管理应用程序的使用意向及相关因素分析[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2024, 45(1): 55-60. |
[15] | 梁爽, 游文静, 许豪勤, 等. 阿尔茨海默病的社会认知度调查研究——基于镇江市的社会调查[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2024, 32(2): 273-275, 281. |
[16] | 马玉芳, 张莲菁, 刘淑聪. 杭州市老年人健康自我管理能力影响因素及促进策略研究[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2021, 37(20): 3571-3576. |
[17] | 刘亚娜, 张朋. 数字时代中国特色老年教育服务的现状、机遇与思考[J]. 成人教育, 2024, 44(5): 39-48. |