|
萧红的家庭伦理思想——基于马克思恩格斯的妇女解放思想的视角
|
Abstract:
在《家庭、私有制和国家的起源》中,私有制和“两种分工”不均是妇女受压迫的主要因素。萧红自身娜拉式出走的情节与她笔下对传统男权社会的颠覆,深刻地体现出了她家庭的伦理思想。将两者相结合思考,不仅有利于深入了解萧红的家庭伦理思想,而且深化了马恩的妇女解放思想,同时,反思新的家庭模式的构建,构建和谐的理想两性关系。
In The Origin of the Family, Private Ownership and the State, private ownership and the unequal “two divisions of labour” are the main factors of women’s oppression. Xiao Hong’s own Nala-like exodus and her subversion of traditional patriarchal society profoundly reflect the ethical ideology of her family. Considering the two together not only facilitates an in-depth understanding of Xiao Hong’s ethical thinking on the family, but also deepens Mann’s idea of women’s liberation, while reflecting on the construction of a new model of the family and the building of a harmonious ideal gender relationship.
[1] | 马克思恩格斯全集(第三卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2002: 68. |
[2] | 恩格斯. 家庭、私有制和国家的起源[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2018. |
[3] | 马克思恩格斯全集(第一卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2002. |
[4] | 葛文. 萧红评传[M]. 哈尔滨: 北方文艺出版社, 1985. |
[5] | 萧红. 呼兰河传[M]. 北京: 中国文联出版社, 2016. |
[6] | 孟悦, 戴锦华. 浮出历史地表: 现代妇女文学研究[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2018. |
[7] | 刘晓辉. 马克思恩格斯妇女解放思想的丰富内涵及当代价值[J]. 中国妇运, 2018(9): 31-33. |
[8] | 许慧琦. “娜拉”在中国: 新女性形象的塑造及其演变(1900s-1930s) [J]. 政大历史, 2003: 45-48. |