全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于扎根理论的危化品企业仓储风险评价——以H危化品公司为例
Warehouse Risk Assessment of Hazardous Chemical Enterprises Based on Grounded Theory—A Case Study of H Hazardous Chemical Company

DOI: 10.12677/orf.2024.143336, PP. 1020-1030

Keywords: 扎根理论,危化品仓储,层次分析法,模糊综合评价
Grounded Theory
, Hazardous Chemical Warehousing, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

危化品仓储事故后果严重,开展危化品企业仓储风险评价意义重大。本研究评价工作包括危化品仓储风险因素识别、风险因素权重计算和基于模糊综合评价的实证研究。本文首先运用扎根理论对108起典型危化品仓储事故调查报告逐级编码,构建了包含5个核心范畴、21个主范畴和52个初始范畴的风险因素体系。接着利用层次分析法求得各级风险因素权重,并以H危化品公司为例开展实证研究,利用模糊综合评价法对该公司仓储风险等级进行评估,得出其风险等级低的结论。
The consequences of hazardous chemical storage accidents are serious, and conducting risk assessments for hazardous chemical enterprise storage is of great significance. The evaluation work of this study includes identification of risk factors for hazardous chemical storage, calculation of risk factor weights, and empirical research based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. This article first applies grounded theory to code the investigation reports of 108 typical hazardous chemical storage accidents step by step, and constructs a risk factor system that includes 5 core categories, 21 main categories, and 52 initial categories. Then, the Analytic Hierarchy Process is used to obtain the weights of risk factors at all levels, and an empirical study is conducted using H Hazardous Chemicals Company as an example. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to evaluate the warehouse risk level of the company, and the conclusion is drawn that its risk level is low.

References

[1]  肖方. 国务院安委办、应急管理部召开专题会议部署开展全国危化品储存安全专项检查整治[J]. 中国消防, 2020(8): 8-9.
[2]  危化品储存仓库安全管理“六必须” [J]. 安全与健康, 2022(10): 78.
[3]  Yang, D.D., Zheng, Y., Peng, K., et al. (2022) Characteristics and Statistical Analysis of Large and above Hazardous Chemical Accidents in China from 2000 to 2020. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, Article No. 15603.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315603
[4]  Wang, B., Li, D. and Wu, C. (2020) Characteristics of Hazardous Chemical Accidents during Hot Season in China from 1989 to 2019: A Statistical Investigation. Safety Science, 129, Article ID: 104788.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104788
[5]  TaikenLina, 郝皓. 从天津港“8.12”事故看化工物流企业仓储安全管理[J]. 物流科技, 2017, 40(5): 153-155.
[6]  程海锋, 张旭东. 危化品仓库的安全设计措施[J]. 化工管理, 2018(8): 127+129.
[7]  董鲁燕. 瀚坤能源油品仓储安全管理改进策略研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 山东科技大学, 2020.
[8]  Chang, Y. and Zhang, D.H. (2022) Causation Analysis of Fire Explosion in the Port’s Hazardous Chemicals Storage Area Based on FTA-AHP. Process Safety Progress, 42, 96-104.
https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12419
[9]  李岩. 危化品仓储燃爆事故风险耦合特性与对策措施分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 湘潭: 湖南科技大学, 2019.
[10]  张岩. 危化品仓储安全状态监测与预警系统[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京石油化工学院, 2020.
[11]  马国乐. 石化企业危化品仓储风险评估及对策研究[J]. 中国经贸导刊(中), 2020(10): 128-130.
[12]  宋玉梅, 熊乾. 互联网+背景下, 危化品物流安全管理体系的构建与思考[J]. 中国储运, 2022(6): 198-199.
[13]  吴毅, 吴刚, 马颂歌. 扎根理论的起源、流派与应用方法述评——基于工作场所学习的案例分析[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2016, 35(3): 32-41.
[14]  杨莉萍, 亓立东, 张博. 质性研究中的资料饱和及其判定[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3): 511-521.
[15]  张辉. 基于层次分析法的建筑施工安全管理分析[J]. 建筑技术开发, 2023, 50(8): 119-122.
[16]  黄辉, 徐浩, 胡红亮, 等. 基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的海上风电场施工吊装作业安全风险评价[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2023, 49(11): 15-19.
[17]  陈丽, 周宏. 基于模糊综合评价和主成分分析法的岩溶流域水资源承载力评价[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2021, 28(6): 159-173.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133