全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

数字化转型如何影响企业创新绩效?——战略柔性的中介作用
How Does Digital Transformation Affect Enterprise Innovation Performance?—The Mediating Role of Strategic Flexibility

DOI: 10.12677/mm.2024.146137, PP. 1172-1184

Keywords: 数字化转型,企业创新绩效,战略柔性,倒U型关系
Digital Transformation
, Enterprise Innovation Performance, Strategic Flexibility, Inverted U-Shape Relationship

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

数字化转型标志着数字技术与生产发展深度融合,目前已经成为企业开展高质量创新活动的必由之路。基于此,本文利用制造业上市公司2011~2021年数据,实证检验数字化转型如何影响企业创新绩效。分析结果显示,虽然数字化转型整体提升了企业创新绩效,但两者之间呈非线性的“倒U型”关系,适度的数字化转型最有利于企业创新绩效的提升,研究进一步发现,企业的数字化转型与战略柔性也是“倒U型”的非线性关系。数字化转型通过“倒U型”曲线效应影响战略柔性,进而影响了企业创新绩效,促成了数字化转型与创新绩效的“倒U型”关系。研究结论揭示了“数字化转型–战略柔性–企业创新绩效”之间的关系,并为企业突破数字化转型困境、提高企业创新绩效提供新路径。
Digital transformation marks the deep integration of digital technology and production development, and has become the only way for enterprises to carry out high-quality innovation activities. Based on this, this article uses manufacturing listed companies data during 2011~2021, to empirically test how digital transition affects the enterprise innovation performance. The analysis results show that although digital transformation improves enterprise innovation performance as a whole, there is a nonlinear “inverted U-shaped” relationship between them, and moderate digital transformation is the most conducive to the improvement of enterprise innovation performance. The study further finds that the digital transformation and strategic flexibility of enterprises are also “inverted U-shaped” nonlinear relationship. Digital transformation affects strategic flexibility through the “inverted U-shaped” curve effect, which further affects the innovation performance of enterprises, and contributes to the “inverted U-shaped” relationship between digital transformation and innovation performance. The research conclusion reveals the relationship between “digital transformation, strategic flexibility and enterprise innovation performance”, and provides a new path for enterprises to break through the dilemma of digital transformation and improve enterprise innovation performance.

References

[1]  张永珅, 李小波, 邢铭强. 企业数字化转型与审计定价[J]. 审计研究, 2021(3): 62-71.
[2]  刘启雷, 张媛, 雷雨嫣, 等. 数字化赋能企业创新的过程、逻辑及机制研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(1): 150-159.
[3]  张吉昌, 龙静. 数字化转型、动态能力与企业创新绩效——来自高新技术上市企业的经验证据[J]. 经济与管理, 2022, 36(3): 74-83
[4]  黄节根, 吉祥熙, 李元旭. 数字化水平对企业创新绩效的影响研究——来自沪深A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 江西社会科学, 2021, 41(5): 61-72, 254-255.
[5]  姚小涛, 亓晖, 刘琳琳, 肖婷. 企业数字化转型: 再认识与再出发[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 42(3): 1-9.
[6]  戚聿东, 蔡呈伟. 数字化对制造业企业绩效的多重影响及其机理研究[J]. 学习与探索, 2020(7): 108-119.
[7]  余江, 孟庆时, 张越, 等. 数字创新: 创新研究新视角的探索及启示[J]. 科学学研究, 2017, 35(7): 1103-1111.
[8]  Evans, J.S. (1991) Strategic Flexibility for High Technology Manoeuvres: A Conceptual Framework. Journal of Management Studies, 28, 69-89.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1991.tb00271.x
[9]  Martínez-Sánchez, A., Vela-Jiménez, M.J., Pérez-Pérez, M., et al. (2009) Inter-Organizational Cooperation and Environmental Change: Moderating Effects between Flexibility and Innovation Performance. British Journal of Management, 20, 537-561.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00605.x
[10]  Farnese, M.L., Fida, R. and Livi, S. (2016) Reflexivity and Flexibility: Complementary Routes to Innovation. Journal of Management & Organization, 22, 404-419.
https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2015.42
[11]  钞小静, 廉园梅, 罗鎏锴. 新型数字基础设施对制造业高质量发展的影响[J]. 财贸研究, 2021, 32(10): 1-13.
https://doi.org/10.19337/j.cnki.34-1093/f.2021.10.001
[12]  Vial, G. (2019) Understanding Digital Transformation: A Review and a Research Agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28, 118-144.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
[13]  李琦, 刘力钢, 邵剑兵. 数字化转型、供应链集成与企业绩效——企业家精神的调节效应[J]. 经济管理, 2021, 43(10): 5-23.
[14]  Hitt, M.A., Keats, B.W. and DeMarie, S.M. (1998) Navigating in the New Competitive Landscape: Building Strategic Flexibility and Competitive Advantage in the 21st Century. Academic of Management Executive, 12, 22-42.
https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1998.1333922
[15]  林亚清, 赵曙明. 政治网络战略、制度支持与战略柔性——恶性竞争的调节作用[J]. 管理世界, 2013(4): 82-93, 188.
[16]  Hajli, M., Sims, J.M. and Ibragimov, V. (2015) Information Technology (IT) Productivity Paradox in the 21st Century. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64, 457-478.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2012-0129
[17]  赵宸宇, 王文春, 李雪松. 数字化转型如何影响企业全要素生产率[J]. 财贸经济, 2021, 42(7): 114-129.
[18]  Kusiak, A. (2017) Smart Manufacturing Must Embrace Big Data. Nature, 544, 23-25.
https://doi.org/10.1038/544023a
[19]  Zhou, K.Z. and Wu, F. (2010) Technological Capability Strategic Flexibility, and Product Innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 547-561.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.830
[20]  李雪松, 党琳, 赵宸宇. 数字化转型、融入全球创新网络与创新绩效[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(10): 43-61.
https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2022.10.003
[21]  宋佳宁, 宋在科. 数字化转型、技术溢出与制造业企业创新绩效[J]. 经济体制改革, 2023(4): 114-122.
[22]  余东华, 马路萌. 数字化转型、平台化变革与企业创新绩效——基于“技术-组织-创新”范式的分析[J]. 改革, 2024(2): 55-74.
[23]  朱晓琴, 罗兰, 关勇军, 等. 数字化转型、社会资本和企业创新绩效[J]. 科技管理学报, 2024, 26(1): 77-89.
https://doi.org/10.16315/j.stm.2024.01.002
[24]  李婉红, 王帆. 数字创新、战略柔性与企业智能化转型——考虑环境复杂性的调节效应[J]. 科学学研究, 2023, 41(3): 521-533.
https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20220804.001
[25]  司颖洁, 李姚矿. 风险投资对高技术产业技术创新的作用研究——基于DEA模型的实证分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2017, 37(12): 167-171.
[26]  Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R. and Chiva, R. (2006) A Measurement Scale for Product Innovation Performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9, 333-346.
https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060610707812
[27]  吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍, 任晓怡. 企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7): 130-144.
[28]  孙博, 刘善仕, 葛淳棉, 姜军辉. 社会网络嵌入视角下人才流动对企业战略柔性的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2020, 17(12): 1760-1768.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133