|
|
Modern Management 2024
人工智能技术应用对员工创新绩效影响研究
|
Abstract:
本研究基于社会认知理论，采用“技术应用–认知–绩效”的研究范式，运用多元线性回归方法探讨了人工智能技术应用对员工创新绩效的影响机制，并重点探究了员工认知灵活性在其中发挥的效应。研究结果表明，人工智能技术应用对员工创新绩效发挥显著的促进作用，认知灵活性在两者中间发挥中介效应。研究结论有利于企业及员工正确认识人工智能技术对员工认知及创新的作用，为企业在如何在激烈的竞争中发挥优势提供理论建议。
Based on the theory of social cognition, this study adopts the research paradigm of “technology application-cognition-performance”, and uses multiple linear regression method to explore the impact mechanism of artificial intelligence technology application on employees’ innovation performance, and focuses on the effect of employees’ cognitive flexibility. The results show that the application of artificial intelligence technology plays a significant role in promoting employees' innovation performance, and cognitive flexibility plays a mediating effect between the two. The conclusion of this study is helpful for enterprises and employees to correctly understand the role of artificial intelligence technology on employee cognition and innovation, and provides theoretical suggestions for enterprises on how to give full play to their advantages in the fierce competition.
| [1] | 屈小博. 机器人和人工智能对就业的影响及趋势[J]. 劳动经济研究, 2019(5): 133-143. |
| [2] | 周卓华. 人工智能技术发展对就业的影响及应对[J]. 重庆社会科学, 2020(10): 44-54. |
| [3] | 高山行, 刘嘉慧. 人工智能对企业管理理论的冲击及应对[J]. 科学学研究, 2018(11): 2004-2010. |
| [4] | Wood, R. and Bandura, A. (1989) Social Cognitive Theory of Organizational Management. Academy of Management Review, 14, 361-384. https://doi.org/10.2307/258173 |
| [5] | Robert, L.P., Pierce, C., Marquis, L., Kim, S. and Alahmad, R. (2020) Designing fair AI for Managing Employees in Organizations: A Review, Critique, and Design Agenda. Human-Computer Interaction, 35, 545-575. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2020.1735391 |
| [6] | Wu, Y. and Koutstaal, W. (2020) Charting the Contributions of Cognitive Flexibility to Creativity: Self-Guided Transitions as a Process-Based Index of Creativity-Related Adaptivity. PLOS ONE, 15, e0234473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234473 |
| [7] | Murray, N., Sujan, H., Hirt, E. R. and Sujan, M. (1990) The Influence of Mood on Categorization: A Cognitive Flexibility Interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 411-425. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.3.411 |
| [8] | Zeb, F., Wang, Q. and Shahjehan, A. (2023) Hypocrisy Is the Tribute that Vice Pays to Virtue: Dynamics of Perceived Organization Hypocrisy and Job Embeddedness in the Hospitality Industry. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article ID: 1036320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1036320 |
| [9] | Li, X., Wang, Q., Shi, R., et al. (2023) Impact of Cooperative Innovation on the Technological Innovation Performance of High-Tech Firms: A Dual Moderating Effect Model of Big Data Capabilities and Policy Support. Big Data, 12, No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2022.0301 |
| [10] | Tang, P.M., Koopman, J., McClean, S.T., et al. (2022) When Conscientious Employees Meet Intelligent Machines: An Integrative Approach Inspired by Complementarity Theory and Role Theory. Academy of Management Journal, 65, 1019-1054. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2020.1516 |
| [11] | Martin, M.M. and Rubin, R.B. (1995) A New Measure of Cognitive Flexibility. Psychological Reports, 76, 623-626. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.623 |
| [12] | 韩翼, 廖建桥, 龙立荣. 雇员工作绩效结构模型构建与实证研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2007(5): 62-77. |
| [13] | Duan, W., Tang, X., Li, Y., Cheng, X. and Zhang, H. (2020) Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Creativity: The Mediation Role of Calling. Creativity Research Journal, 32, 403-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1821563 |
| [14] | Kong, H., Yin, Z., Chon, K., Yuan, Y. and Yu, J. (2023) How Does Artificial Intelligence (AI) Enhance Hospitality Employee Innovation? The Roles of Exploration, AI Trust, and Proactive Personality. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 33, 261-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2023.2258116 |
| [15] | Zhang, S., Ke, X., Frank Wang, X. H. and Liu, J. (2018) Empowering Leadership and Employee Creativity: A Dual-Mechanism Perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91, 896-917. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12219 |
