预防性环境公益诉讼的实现路径——以云南绿孔雀案为例
The Realization Path of Prevention Environmental Public Interest Litigation—Taking Yunnan Green Peacock Case as an Example

多年来，我国在生态环境立法层面深入研究风险预防原则，生态环境部也多次强调要有效防范生态环境风险，都反映出中国生态文明建设的重点是发展和落实预防原则。一直以来，救济性环境公益诉讼制度在我国发挥着重要作用，但其在环境保护方面的滞后性和不可逆性促使我们加快了完善预防性环境公益诉讼的脚步。通过研究我国云南绿孔雀案这一典型环境案件，可知我国当前预防性环境公益诉讼在重大风险的界限认定、责任承担方式等方面亟待发展完善。结合云南绿孔雀案反映的问题、我国环境法体系中相关规定、美国禁止令制度的经验以及各位学者的研究成果，探究我国预防性环境公益诉讼的实现路径。
Over the years, China has conducted thorough research on the precautionary principle in the legislative aspect of the ecological environment, and Ministry of Ecology and Environment has repeatedly stressed the need to effectively prevent ecological environmental risks, which reflects that the focus of China’s ecological civilization construction is to develop and implement the precautionary principle. The relief environmental public interest litigation system has been playing an important role in our country, but its lag and irreversibility in environmental protection prompted us to speed up the pace of improving the preventive environmental public interest litigation. Through the study of the Yunnan Green Peacock case, a typical environmental case, it is evident that China’s current preventive environmental public interest litigation needs to be improved in the identification of major risk limits and the way of responsibility. Combining the problems reflected in the Yunnan green Peacock case, the relevant provisions in China’s environmental law system, the experience of the US injunction system and the research results of scholars, this paper explores the realization path of preventive environmental public interest litigation in China.