全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

大学物理课程评价体系改革初探与实践
Preliminary Exploration and Practice of the Reform in the Evaluation System for College Physics Course

DOI: 10.12677/ae.2024.146903, PP. 108-112

Keywords: 大学物理,评价体系,目标模式
College Physics
, Evaluation System, Objective Model

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

探讨了大学物理课程评价体系的改革与实践。传统评价体系侧重于知识的掌握,忽视能力和素质评价;重视评价的诊断、监督和管理功能,忽视导向、激励、调节、教育功能;评价主体过于依赖教师。提出了基于三维目标的评价体系,强调一致性、客观性和个性化原则。知识目标通过随堂检测、作业等方式评价;能力目标通过课堂表现、实验操作等评价;素质目标则通过口头报告、问卷调查等方式进行评价。结合现代教育技术重建评价体系,取得了积极效果,学生成绩逐年提高。未来计划引入人工智能技术,构建智能化评价体系,以实现更高效、个性化的教学评价。
This study explores the reform and practice of the evaluation system for college physics course. The traditional evaluation system focuses on the mastery of knowledge, ignoring the evaluation of abilities and qualities. It overemphasizes diagnosis, supervision, and management functions while neglecting guidance, incentive, adjustment, and educational functions. Additionally, the evaluation subject relies too much on teachers. An evaluation system based on three-dimensional objectives is proposed, emphasizing the principles of consistency, objectivity, and individualization. The knowledge objective is evaluated through classroom tests and homework, while the ability objective is evaluated through classroom performance and experimental operations. The quality objective is qualitatively evaluated through oral reports and questionnaires. The course team has achieved positive results by reconstructing the evaluation system and combining it with modern educational technology, leading to improvement in student performance. It is planned to introduce artificial intelligence technology to build an intelligent evaluation system, aiming to achieve more efficient and personalized teaching evaluation.

References

[1]  高等学校物理基础课程教学指导分委员会. 理工科类大学物理课程教学基本要求[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2011: 2.
[2]  孙厚谦, 洪林, 史友进, 等. 应用型工科“大学物理”课程教学改革的实践与思考[J]. 中国大学教学, 2010(12): 49-51.
[3]  王伟. 基于翻转课堂的“同伴”教学法[J]. 实验室科学, 2022, 25(1): 92-94+98.
[4]  张静, 姚建欣, 丁林. 学习进阶视角下混合式教学模式的构建与实验——以“大学物理”课程为例[J]. 现代教育技术, 2020, 30(10): 65-70.
[5]  沈黄晋, 王建波, 乔豪学, 等. 树立以学生发展为中心的理念促进大学物理课程体系的改革与创新[J]. 物理与工程, 2022, 32(4): 96-100.
[6]  其木格. 基于线上线下混合式教学的大学物理过程性评价[J]. 内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 36(1): 100-105.
[7]  焦健, 陈敬艳, 石浩辰, 等. 大学物理课程过程性评价探讨[J]. 长春师范大学学报, 2021, 40(8): 149-152.
[8]  张峰强, 高翔, 张红洋, 等. 大学物理随堂教学效果评价实用方法[J]. 大学物理, 2021, 40(5): 55-59.
https://doi.org/10.16854/j.cnki.1000-0712.200256
[9]  Spady, W.G. (1994) Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers. American Association of School Administrators, Arlington, VA, 2.
[10]  李华振, 杜伟伟, 彭敏. 大学物理课程线上线下混合式教学的研究与实践——以新疆工程学院为例[J]. 才智, 2022(3): 90-93.
[11]  王小娟, 陈星. 分级教学理念下高等数学课程教学改革研究与实践[J]. 科教导刊, 2023(3): 46-49.
[12]  纪锋, 吐尔迪?吾买尔, 尚志勇, 等. 基于“互联网+”的“工程力学”课程教学探究[J]. 西部素质教育, 2023, 9(21): 135-138+152.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133