Nearly two decades since Cone Beam-Computed Tomography (CBCT) was introduced in dentistry, this technology has been proven to be a useful asset in modern dental practice. The information gleaned from a CBCT scan influences treatment decisions and prognostication of some orthodontics cases. Objective: To evaluate the reasons for the use of cone beam by Moroccan orthodontists in their clinical practice. Materials and Methods: We carried out a descriptive cross-sectional study to evaluate professional practices regarding CBCT as an imaging technique in orthodontics. To do this, we conducted a questionnaire that was sent via email to all teachers and specialists in orthodontics in Morocco. Then, an analytical study was carried out with the help of the Microsoft Excel software in order to allow us to interpret the results obtained. Results: Our study achieved a response rate of 51%. The findings indicated that 100% of Moroccan orthodontists use CBCT as a secondary diagnostic tool rather than routinely. Analysis revealed a notable prevalence of CBCT prescription among Moroccan orthodontists, particularly among those with 10 to 20 years of experience, tapering off among those with over 20 years of experience. According to our survey, CBCT was primarily employed for locating impacted teeth, supernumerary teeth, and root resorption. Conversely, its use for orthognathic surgery and cleft lips was less frequent. Moroccan orthodontists demonstrated confidence in their CBCT expertise, which they attribute to widespread training in its use and interpretation. However, the acquisition of CBCT equipment remains a significant challenge for many practitioners. Most orthodontists reported refraining from using CBCT scans for children due to high costs and radiation exposure, factors that also deter patient requests for CBCT. Finally, a majority of Moroccan orthodontists anticipate that in five years, CBCT will be prescribed only when clinically necessary rather than routinely. Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that CBCT is finding its place more and more in Moroccan orthodontic practice. Moroccan orthodontists are aware of the interest of this new technology in their daily practice. Efforts should be made to improve the equipment status of Moroccan orthodontists to make them more easily use it.
References
[1]
Makdissi, J. (2013) L’utilisation du conebeam en orthodontie: La situation actuelle. International Orthodontics, 11, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2012.12.012
[2]
(2020) Cone Beam: Le gold standard de la chirurgie dentaire. Owandy Radi-ology. https://www.owandy.fr/cone-beam-le-gold-standard-de-l-imagerie-sectionnelle-3d-en-odonto-stomatologie/
[3]
Halimi, A., Benyahia, H., Azeroual, M., Bahije, L. and Zaoui, F. (2017) Relations entre la divergence faciale et les paramètres de la DDM. International Orthodontics, 15, 698-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2017.09.018
[4]
Nasseh, I. and Al-Rawi, W. (2018) Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Dental Clinics of North America, 62, 361-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2018.03.002
[5]
Felizardo, R., Thomas, A. and Foucart, J. (2012) Techniques radiographiques utiles en orthodontie. L’Orthodontie Française, 83, 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1051/orthodfr/2012003
[6]
American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (2013) Clinical Recommendations Regarding Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics. Position Statement by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, and Oral Radiology, 116, 238-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.06.002
[7]
Caiado, G.M., Evangelista, K., Freire, M.d.C.M., Almeida, F.T., Pacheco-Pereira, C., Flores-Mir, C., et al. (2021) Orthodontists’ Criteria for Prescribing Cone-Beam Computed Tomography—A Multi-Country Survey. Clinical Oral Investigations, 26, 1625-1636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04135-9
[8]
Roges, R.A., Abulhamael, A.M., Alzamzami, Z.T., Talim, D.J., Khawaji, H. and Barzanji, S. (2019) Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Usage: Survey of American Endodontists. The Journal of Con-temporary Dental Practice, 20, 1132-1137. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2661
[9]
Guerrero, M.E., Noriega, J., Castro, C. and Jacobs, R. (2014) Does Cone-Beam CT Alter Treatment Plans? Comparison of Preoperative Implant Planning Using Panoramic versus Cone-Beam CT Images. Imaging Science in Dentistry, 44, 121-128. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2014.44.2.121
[10]
Dobbyn, L.M., Morrison, J.F., Brocklebank, L.M. and Chung, L.L. (2013) A Survey of the First 6 Years of Experience with Cone Beam CT Scanning in a Teaching Hospital Orthodontic Department. Journal of Orthodontics, 40, 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1179/1465313312y.0000000041
[11]
Lavanya, R., Babu, D.B.G., Waghray, S., Chaitanya, N.C.S.K., Mamatha, B. and Nithika, M. (2016) A Questionnaire Cross-Sectional Study on Application of CBCT in Dental Postgraduate Students. Polish Journal of Radiology, 81, 181-189. https://doi.org/10.12659/pjr.895688
[12]
Katheria, B.C., Kau, C.H., Tate, R., Chen, J.W., English, J. and Bouquot, J. (2010) Effectiveness of Impacted and Supernumerary Tooth Diagnosis from Traditional Radiography versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Pediatric Dentistry Journal, 32, 304-309.
[13]
Galicia, J.C., Kawilarang, J. and Tawil, P.Z. (2017) Clinical Endodontic Applications of Cone Beam-Computed Tomography in Modern Dental Practice. Open Journal of Stomatology, 7, 314-326. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojst.2017.77026
[14]
Masyte, V., Sefeldaite, S. and Venskutonis, T. (2021) A Questionnaire of Digital Radiography and CBCT Use and Knowledge among Lithuanian Dentists. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Research, 12, e2. https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2021.12102
[15]
Setzer, F.C., Hinckley, N., Kohli, M.R. and Karabucak, B. (2017) A Survey of Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Use among Endodontic Practitioners in the United States. Journal of Endodontics, 43, 699-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.021
