全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

以促进企业合规为中心的行政执法和解制度构建
Construction of Administrative Reconciliation System Centered on Promoting Corporate Compliance

DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2024.125495, PP. 3490-3497

Keywords: 行政执法,行政和解,企业合规
Administrative Enforcement of Law
, Administrative Reconciliation, Corporate Complain

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

在行政日趋民主化的现代社会,行政执法和解具有降低行政执法成本、促使解决行政纠纷的重大作用。如今的理论框架已经初步建立,而实践中行政执法和解却面临着难以投入适用和缺乏具体应用的难题。如何在行政领域实现行政执法和解制度的高度本土化,并将其真正地运用到实践之中,是行政法学界历来的讨论热门。参考借鉴英美国家的经验,本文认为引入企业合规制度并将其作为行政执法和解的必要条件,可以改善当下所存在的问题,实现行政执法和解制度的优化升级。而在未来,监管部门应加快建立行政监管激励机制、重视企业合规机制的运作和审查并建立第三方监督评估,且在此基础上进一步改善,形成更加完备的以企业合规为核心的行政执法和解制度体系。
In the modern society with the increasing democratization of administration, administrative law enforcement reconciliation, as a new mechanism to deal with administrative disputes in recent years, plays an important role in reducing the cost of administrative law enforcement and promoting the settlement of administrative disputes. Now the theoretical framework has been initially established, but in practice, administrative law enforcement reconciliation is faced with the problem of limited scope of application and lack of concrete application. How to realize the highly localization of administrative law enforcement and reconciliation system in the administrative field and apply it into practice is always a hot topic in the academic circle of administrative law. Referring to the experience of British and American countries, this paper believes that introducing corporate compliance system and taking it as a necessary condition for administrative law enforcement reconciliation can improve the existing problems and realize the optimization and upgrading of administrative law enforcement reconciliation system. In the future, regulatory authorities should accelerate the establishment of administrative supervision incentive mechanism, attach importance to the operation and review of enterprise compliance mechanism, establish third-party supervision and evaluation, and gradually improve the institutional system of enterprise compliance in the process of administrative law enforcement and reconciliation.

References

[1]  方世荣. 白云锋. 行政执法和解的模式及其运用[J]. 法学研究, 2019, 41(5): 83-98.
[2]  孙春雷. 论行政执法和解中企业合规的引入[J]. 长春市委党校学报, 2021(1): 41-46.
[3]  王赛赛. 行政执法和解制度研究[J]. 法制与经济, 2019(12): 42-43.
[4]  施建辉. 行政执法中的协商与和解[J]. 行政法学研究, 2006(3): 9-15.
[5]  杨为乔. 证监会、高盛行政执法和解背后[J]. 董事会, 2019(6): 58-59.
[6]  李本灿. 企业视角下的合规计划建构方法[J]. 法学杂志, 2020, 41(7): 76-83.
[7]  陈瑞华. 有效合规管理的两种模式[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2022, 28(1): 5-24.
[8]  陈瑞华. 企业有效合规整改的基本思路[J]. 政法论坛, 2022, 40(1): 87-103.
[9]  陈瑞华. 行政执法和解与企业合规[J]. 中国律师, 2020(6): 85-87.
[10]  陈瑞华. 论企业合规在行政监管机制中的地位[J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛), 2021, 36(6): 1-20.
[11]  张红. 证券行政执法和解问题剖析[J]. 行政管理改革, 2015(5): 59-63.
[12]  吴建华. 法律顾问参与企业合规建设的探析[J]. 法制与社会, 2020(15): 219-220.
[13]  涂龙科, 刘东. 美国企业合规计划的要素与启示[J]. 中国检察官, 2021(16): 74-79.
[14]  张红. 破解行政执法和解的难题——基于证券行政执法和解的观察[J]. 行政法学研究, 2015(2): 23-33 38.
[15]  涂怀艳. 行政执法和解初探[J]. 法商研究, 2008(2): 68-74.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133