全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

重释科德错误观:理据与路径
Reinterpreting Corder’s View of Errors: Rationale and Approach

DOI: 10.12677/ml.2024.125425, PP. 780-785

Keywords: 科德,错误,理据,路径,外语教学
Corder
, Error, Rationale, Approach, Foreign Language Teaching

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

错误是外语教学中无法规避的现象,外语习得的过程亦是一个不断犯错、纠错的过程。对待错误的看法和方法深刻影响着外语的教学与习得。二十世纪六七十年代,一些具有代表性的关于错误的理论观点应运而生,其中最有造诣、最为有名、对外语教学最有价值和吸引力的当属科德的研究。相较于行为主义、结构主义理论将错误作为学习失败的标志,并果断采取零容忍的态度,科德则另辟新径,不仅揭示出错误对外语学习、外语教师和研究者的巨大价值,更重要的是接纳错误,以错误为“理据”和“路径”,这对我们当下重审错误有其重要意义,以促进外语的习得,并提高外语教学的实效。
Errors are unavoidable in foreign language teaching and learning, and the process of acquiring a foreign language is also a process of making and correcting errors. The views and methods of dealing with errors have a profound influence on the teaching and acquisition of foreign languages. In the 1960s and 1970s, some representative theoretical perspectives on errors emerged, among which the most accomplished, the most famous, and the most valuable and attractive to foreign language teaching are the studies of Corder. Compared with the behaviorist and structuralist theories, which take errors as a sign of learning failure and adopt a zero-tolerance attitude, Corder’s new approach not only reveals the great value of errors to foreign language learning, foreign language teachers and researchers, but also, more importantly, accepts errors as “rationale” and “approach”. This is of great significance to our current review of errors, in order to promote foreign language acquisition and improve the effectiveness of foreign language teaching.

References

[1]  Corder, S.P. (1967) The Significance of Learner’s Error. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5, 161-170.
https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161
[2]  Brook, N. (1960) Language and Language Learning. 2nd Edition, Harcourt, Brace & World Inc., New York.
[3]  Ellis, R. (2000) Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Shanghai Foreign Language Teaching Publishing House, Shanghai.
[4]  施光. EFL教学中的纠错——教师与学生的看法与纠错效果的关系[J]. 外语教学理论与实践, 2008(2): 29-32, 44.
[5]  Corder, S.P. (1983) Error Analysis and Interlanguage. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[6]  Ellis, R. (1994) The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[7]  Richards, J. (1971) The Error Analysis and Second Language Strategies. Language Sciences, 17, 12-22.
[8]  James, C. (1998) Errors in Language Learning and Use—Exploring Error Analysis. Longman, London.
[9]  皮特?科德. 应用语言学导论[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 1983: 251
[10]  George, H. (1972) Common Errors in Language Learning: Insights from English. Newbury House, Rowley, MA.
[11]  Corder, S.P. (1975) Error Analysis, Interlanguage and Second Language Acquisition. Language Teaching & Linguistics: Abstracts, 8, 201-218.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800002822
[12]  戴炜栋, 束定芳. 对比分析、错误分析和中介语研究中的若干问题——外语教学理论研究之二[J]. 外国语, 1994(5): 1-7.
[13]  蔡龙权, 戴炜栋. 错误分类的整合[J]. 外语界, 2001(4): 52-57.
[14]  郝兴跃. 论外语/二语习得中的错误分析[J]. 山东外语教学, 2000(1): 44-47.
[15]  Haded, S. (1998) The Merits of Exploring Error Analysis in Foreign Language Teaching and Learning. RELC Journal, 29, 55-65.
https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829802900104

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133