全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

中小学生英语作文的句法复杂度特征研究
A Study on the Features of Syntactic Complexity in English Writings by Elementary and Secondary School Students

DOI: 10.12677/ml.2024.125416, PP. 693-703

Keywords: 粗颗粒句法指标,细颗粒句法指标,句法复杂度,英语作文
Large-Grained Syntactic Indices
, Fine-Grained Syntactic Indices, Syntactic Complexity, English Writings

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本研究按年级划分为3组,横向考察了中低水平英语学习者英语作文的句法复杂度特点。句法复杂度包括粗颗粒和细颗粒度句法指标,采用TAASSC软件自动识别并标注中小学生英语作文句法复杂度参数,对比和分析19项句法指标与不同年级段之间的关系。研究发现:初学者通常依赖于并列短语、简单句或存现句,而中低水平者倾向使用从属结构;随着二语水平的提升,名词的后置修饰语比例增加,母语思维的影响逐渐减小。基于以上发现,本研究对英语句法教学提出了几点建议。教师可以利用句法多样性教学,有意识地培养学生在书面写作中使用更为复杂的句法结构,有助于提升中小学生的英语句法能力和语言意识。
This research reports a cross-sectional study on the syntactic complexity features of English writings of low- and intermediate-level English learners in three groups divided by grade level. Syntactic complexity is categorized into large-grained and fine-grained syntactic indices. TAASSC software was used to automatically identify and label the syntactic complexity parameters of English writing of primary and secondary school students, and the relationship between 19 syntactic indices and different grade bands was compared and analyzed. The study reveals that beginners typically rely on coordinate phrases, simple sentences, and existential sentences, while low- and intermediate-level learners tend to use subordinate structures. With the improvement of L2 proficiency, the proportion of post-modified nouns increases, and the influence of native language thinking gradually diminishes. Based on these findings, several suggestions are proposed for English syntactic teaching. Teachers can employ syntactic diversity instruction to deliberately train students in the use of more complex syntactic structures in their writing, which facilitates the enhancement of syntactic ability and linguistic awareness among elementary and secondary school students.

References

[1]  袁辉, 刘婷婷, 徐剑. 基于句法发展的中小学英语写作教学干预研究[J]. 天津师范大学学报(基础教育版), 2023, 25(3): 7-12.
[2]  Ortega, L. (2003) Syntactic Complexity Measures and Their Relationship to L2 Proficiency: A Research Synthesis of College-Level L2 Writing. Applied Linguistics, 24, 492-518.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492
[3]  Lu, X.F. and Ai, H.Y. (2015) Syntactic Complexity in College-Level English Writing: Differences among Writers with Diverse L1 Backgrounds. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 16-27.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.003
[4]  Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S. and Kim, H.Y. (1998) Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity. University of Hawai’i Press, Honolulu.
[5]  高霞. 不同水平学习者英语作文句法复杂度研究[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2021, 53(2): 224-237 319.
[6]  张晓鹏, 李雯雯. 句法复杂度对中国大学生英语说明文写作质量的预测效应[J]. 现代外语, 2022, 45(3): 331-343.
[7]  Kyle, K. and Crossley, S.A. (2018) Measuring Syntactic Complexity in L2 Writing Using Fine-Grained Clausal and Phrasal Indices. The Modern Language Journal, 102, 333-349.
https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12468
[8]  Shao, Z.M., Zhang, H.B., et al. (2022) Phrasal Complexity in English Argumentative Writing: Variations across Chinese STEM versus English Majors’ Production and EFL Textbook Essays. Journal of English for Academic Purpose, 55, Article ID: 101070.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101070
[9]  雷蕾. 中国英语学习者学术写作句法复杂度研究[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2017, 40(5): 1-10 159.
[10]  朱慧敏, 杨连瑞, 刘艳梅. 二语写作句法动态发展变异特征研究[J]. 外语教学, 2021, 42(1): 41-46 65.
[11]  Lu, X. (2010) Automatic Analysis of Syntactic Complexity in Second Language Writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15, 474-496.
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu
[12]  Khushik, G.A. and Huhta, A. (2020) Investigating Syntactic Complexity in EFL Learners’ Writing across Common European Framework of Reference Levels A1, A2, and B1. Applied Linguistics, 41, 506-532.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy064
[13]  Yang, W., Lu, X. and Weigle, S.C. (2015) Different Topics, Different Discourse: Relationships among Writing Topic, Measures of Syntactic Complexity, and Judgments of Writing Quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, 53-67.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.02.002
[14]  Kyle, K. (2016) Measuring Syntactic Development in L2 Writing: Fine Grained Indices of Syntactic Complexity and Usage-Based Indices of Syntactic Sophistication. Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
[15]  Ziaeian, E. and Golparvar, S.E. (2022) Fine-Grained Measures of Syntactic Complexity in the Discussion Section of Research Articles: The Effect of Discipline and Language Background. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 57, Article ID: 101116.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101116
[16]  王华. 中国英语学习者议论文名词短语复杂度历时变化研究[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2022, 54(5): 739-749 800.
[17]  Jiang, J. and Bi, P. (2019) Syntactic Complexity Development in the Writings of EFL Learners: Insights from a Dependency Syntactically-Annotated Corpus. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46, Article ID: 100666.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100666
[18]  Díez-Bedmar, M.B. and Pérez-Paredes, P. (2020) Noun Phrase Complexity in Young Spanish EFL Learners’ Writing: Complementing Syntactic Complexity Indices with Corpus-Driven Analyses. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 25, 4-35.
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17058.die
[19]  张会平, 张思雨. 中学生笔语句法复杂度发展特征研究[J]. 外语研究, 2020, 37(6): 60-66 73.
[20]  Biber, D., Gray, B., et al. (2011) Should We Use Characteristics of Conversation to Measure Grammatical Complexity in L2 Writing Development? TESOL Quarterly, 45, 5-35.
https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133