试论孟子所谓“性”
A Test of Mencius’ So-Called “Sexuality”

孟子之“性”是中国哲学史上一个难解的范畴，古来学者对此争论不休。引起争论的根本原因在于误用带有理智主义和功利主义色彩的“则故”之法来言“性”。本文尝试跳出“则故”的思想视域，以孟子“行其所无事”为切口，借助梁漱溟对孟子思想的精微阐释，对孟子的“性”论思想进行简要的梳理与解读。
Mencius’ “nature” is a difficult category in the history of Chinese philosophy, which has been debated by scholars throughout the ages. The root cause of the controversy lies in the misuse of the method of “reason” with rationalism and utilitarianism to speak of “sexuality”. This paper tries to jump out of the ideological field of “Zegu”, takes Mencius’ “doing what he did not do” as an entry point, and makes use of Liang Shuming’s subtle interpretation of Mencius’ thought to make a brief sorting and interpretation of Mencius’ thought on “sexuality”. With the help of Liang Shuming’s subtle interpretation of Mengzi’s thought, we will briefly summarize and interpret Mengzi’s idea of “sexuality”.