全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于绿色闭环供应链的低值可回收物政府补贴研究
Low Value Recyclables Based on a Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research on Government Subsidies

DOI: 10.12677/mos.2024.133262, PP. 2888-2896

Keywords: 低值可回收物,政府补贴,绿色闭环供应链,决策
Low Value Recyclables
, Government Subsidies, Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain, Decision-Making

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

针对各类低值可回收物进行一刀切补贴的现状,本文以制造商、第三方回收商和消费者组成的绿色闭环供应链为研究对象,在政府补贴第三方回收商的情况下,构建了同时考虑到经济因素和环境影响的低值可回收物社会效益模型。本文以废玻璃与废纸类为例,通过理论证明和数值仿真验证模型的有效性,结果表明:政府补贴对不同种类的低值可回收物的影响程度不同,应切合各类低值可回收物实际情况对其进行分类补贴。
In response to the current situation of providing comprehensive subsidies for various types of low value recyclables in Shanghai, this article takes a green closed-loop supply chain composed of manufacturers, third-party recyclers, and consumers as the research object. In the case of government subsidies for third-party recyclers, a social benefit model for low value recyclables is constructed that considers both economic and environmental factors. This article takes waste glass and paper as examples and verifies the effectiveness of the model through theoretical proof and numerical simulation. The results show that government subsidies have varying degrees of impact on different types of low value recyclable materials and should be classified and subsidized according to the actual situation of each type of low value recyclable material.

References

[1]  徐扬, 刘猛, 孙冬石. 区块链驱动下低值可回收物资源化环境效益分析[J]. 物流科技, 2022, 45(9): 70-73 77.
[2]  邱铤. 上海低价值可回收物收运服务标准化建设研究[J]. 商业经济, 2020(7): 35-37.
[3]  Malindzakova, M., ?tofková, J. and Majernik, M. (2022) Economic–Environmental Performance of Reverse Logistics of Disposable Beverage Packaging. Sustainability, 14, Article ID: 7544.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137544
[4]  杜欢政, 张挺, 刘飞仁. 低值可回收物补贴参照垃圾处置费“一刀切”合适吗? ——基于上海的验证[J]. 浙江工商大学学报, 2021(1): 111-124.
[5]  杜欢政, 刘飞仁, 王云飞. 全过程成本下的城市低值废弃物补贴核算——以上海松江区为例[J]. 南通大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 35(6): 34-41.
[6]  Dai, R., Zhang, J.X. and Tang, W. (2017) Cartelization or Cost-sharing? Comparison of Cooperation Modes in a Green Supply Chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, 159-173.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.011
[7]  Yu, Y., Han, X. and Hu, G. (2016) Optimal Production for Manufacturers Considering Consumer Environmental Awareness and Green Subsidies. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 397-408.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.09.014
[8]  江世英, 方鹏骞. 基于绿色供应链的政府补贴效果研究[J]. 系统管理学报, 2019, 28(3): 594-600.
[9]  温兴琦, 程海芳, 蔡建湖, 卢超. 绿色供应链中政府补贴策略及效果分析[J]. 管理学报, 2018, 15(4): 625-632.
[10]  曹裕, 寻静雅, 李青松. 基于不同政府补贴策略的供应链绿色努力决策比较研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(5): 108-118.
[11]  Savaskan, R.C., Bhattacharya, S. and Van Wassenhove, L. (2004) Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing. Management Science, 50, 239-252.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0186
[12]  Cao, K.Y., He, P. and Liu, Z.X. (2020) Production and Pricing Decisions in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain under Remanufacturing Subsidy Policy and Carbon Tax Policy. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71, 1199-1215.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1605471
[13]  左乐. 城市生活垃圾处置设施的环境经济损益分析[J]. 绿色建筑, 2020, 12(4): 131-133.
[14]  尉薛菲. 中国生活垃圾分类产业的经济学分析[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国社会科学院, 2020.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133