全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

不同储存时间下大曲的变化
Changes in Daqu under Different Storage Times

DOI: 10.12677/hjfns.2024.132032, PP. 250-256

Keywords: 软质小麦,曲药,糖化力,发酵力
Soft Wheat
, Koji, Saccharification Power, Fermentation Power

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

以软质小麦为原料,探究不同存储时间对曲药质量的影响。以新制曲药(储存时间一周)、老曲药(储存一个月的曲药)和生产曲药(储存时间六个月)为研究对象,探究三个储存时间下曲药糖化力、液化力、酸度、水分、淀粉、发酵力的变化,从而确定不同储存时间对曲药理化指标的影响。结果表明,新制曲药糖化力为850.0~970.0 mg/g·h、液化力0.44~0.59 g/g·h、酸度0.73~0.77、水分12.25%~14.51%、淀粉59.0%~59.74%、发酵力300.0~396.0 ml/g·72h。老曲药糖化力为750.0~950.0 mg/g·h、液化力0.43~0.59 g/g·h、酸度0.72~0.78、水分11.25%~14.27%、淀粉59.10%~59.60%、发酵力286.0~361.0 ml/g·72h。生产曲药糖化力为280.0~380.0 mg/g·h、液化力0.25~0.31 g/g·h、酸度0.7~0.75、水分10.08%~12.05%、淀粉59.26%~59.51%、发酵力118.0~186.0 ml/g·72h。
Using soft wheat as raw material, the influence of different storage times on the quality of koji medicine was studied. Taking new koji medicines (stored for one week), old koji medicines (stored for one month), and produced koji medicines (stored for six months) as the research objects, the changes in saccharification power, liquefaction power, acidity, moisture, starch, and fermentation power of koji under three storage times were investigated, so as to determine the influence of different storage time on physicochemical indexes of koji medicine. The results indicated that the saccharification power of the new koji medicine was 850.0~970.0 mg/g?h, liquefaction power 0.44~0.59 g/g?h, acidity 0.73~0.77, moisture content 12.25%~14.51%, starch content 59.0%~59.74%, fermentation power 300.0~396.0 ml/g?72h. The saccharification power of the old koji medicines was 750.0~950.0 mg/g?h, liquefaction power 0.43~0.59 g/g?h, acidity 0.72~0.78, moisture content 11.25%~14.27%, starch content 59.10%~59.60%, fermentation power 286.0~361.0 ml/g?72h. The saccharification power of the produced koji medicines was 280.0~380.0 mg/g?h, liquefaction power 0.25~0.31 g/g?h, acidity 0.7~0.75, moisture content 10.08%~12.05%, starch content 59.26%~59.51%, fermentation power 118.0~186.0 ml/g?72h.

References

[1]  孙彩玲, 曲辉英, 吕建华, 等. 基于主成分和聚类分析的山东省区试小麦品种(系)品质的综合评价[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 45(4): 545-551.
[2]  中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 17320-2013《小麦品种品质分类》[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2013.
[3]  赵新, 王步军. 不同硬度小麦品质差异的分析[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2009, 29(2): 6.
[4]  Sakandar, H.A., Hussain, R., Farid, K.Q., et al. (2020) Functional Microbiota in Chinese Traditional Baijiu and Mijiu Qu (Starters). Food Research International, 138, Article 109830.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109830
[5]  张清玫, 赵鑫锐, 李江华, 等. 不同香型白酒大曲微生物群落及其与风味的相关性[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2022, 48(10): 1-8.
[6]  刘文虎, 柴丽娟, 张立强, 等. 基于宏基因组学解析不同质量等级中温大曲微生物组的异质性[J]. 微生物学报, 2023, 63(11): 4383-4398.
[7]  谢丹, 吴成, 毕远林, 等. 酱香型白酒高温大曲储存过程中微生物群落演替与理化因子相关性研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2023, 44(15): 151-158.
[8]  陆其刚, 杨勇, 沈晓波, 等. 酿酒原料的发酵特性研究[J]. 酿酒, 2019, 46(4): 16-20.
[9]  中华人民共和国工业和信息化部. QB/T 4257-2011《酿酒大曲通用分析方法》[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011.
[10]  邓玉玲. 生料制曲与熟料制曲工艺对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 自贡: 四川轻化工大学, 2020.
[11]  侯强川, 王文航, 徐媛媛, 等. 徐坊中高温大曲发酵过程中理化品质、风味及真菌群落结构变化规律研究[EB/OL]. 食品工业科技, 2024.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.1759.TS.20240313.1124.004, 2024-03-14.
[12]  宋瑞滨, 邵泽良, 宋军. 不同季节生产浓香型中高温包包曲的分析与探讨[J]. 酿酒, 2022, 49(5): 80-86.
[13]  邢钢, 敖宗华, 王松涛, 等. 不同温度大曲制曲过程理化指标变化分析研究[J]. 酿酒科技, 2014(6): 20-23.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133