论债权转让通知的适格主体
The Qualified Subject of the Notice of Assignment of Creditor’s Rights

由于《民法典》第546条债权让与通知之措辞较为概括，关于债权受让人是否可以作出有效债权转让通知的问题在实践和学理上存在着较大争议。文章认为，第一，《民法典》并未明令禁止受让人通知，在尊重意思自治的民法领域，受让人进行债权转让通知似无不妥。第二，相比债权人，受让人更关心债权的履行，在债权人故意拖延通知或者债权多重让与场合，受让人通知有其必要性。第三，若有相应的配套制度保护交易安全，允许债权人通知有利于促进债权流转、提高交易效率。债权受让人作为债权转让通知的适格主体并无不妥，其重点在于受让人进行有效债权转让通知的制度构造。
Because of the general wording of notice of assignment of Creditor’s right in article 546 of the Civil Code, there is a great controversy on whether the assignee of creditor’s right can give effective notice of assignment of Creditor’s right in practice and theory. Firstly, the Civil Code does not prohibit the assignee from giving notice. In the field of civil law which respects the autonomy of will, it is not inappropriate for the assignee to give notice of assignment of Creditor’s rights. Second, the assignee is more concerned about the performance of the creditor than the creditor, in the case of the creditor deliberately delay notice or multiple assignment of the creditor, the assignee notification has its necessity. Third, if there is a corresponding supporting system to protect the transaction security, allowing creditors notice is conducive to promote the flow of claims, improve transaction efficiency. It is not inappropriate for the assignee to be the qualified subject of the notice of assignment of Creditor’s rights, and its emphasis is on the system construction of the effective notice of assignment of Creditor’s rights by the assignee.