Background: Early exploration of the semi constrained “Floating-Socket” total shoulder replacement (TSR) in 1974 led to a proliferation of various unconstrained designs that allowed resection or retention of the humeral head, depending upon the pathological process involved. Degenerative glenohumeral arthritis with mild to moderate involvement of subchondral bone allowed for a resurfacing option, while severe humeral head involvement required a partial or full humeral head replacement attached to an intramedullary stem for fixation. All components evolved from cemented to cementless application by 1982. The purpose of this paper is to describe the progression of Buechel-Pappas (B-P) shoulder replacement development from the early 1970’s in both cemented and cement less applications. Methods: Clinical evaluations of “Floating-Socket” TSR, followed by B-P stem-type, resurfacing types, bipolar-type and revision components, all of which comprise the B-P Shoulder Replacement System, were performed over a 49-year period. Results: “Floating-Socket” implants improved the results of simple, constrained ball-in-socket designs, but generally failed by glenoid component loosening in both chimpanzee and human applications. Unconstrained resurfacing-type components, both anatomical humeral head and full proximal humeral components, were quite successful, with minimal failures observed in long-term studies. Bipolar salvage implants, used for severe proximal deficiencies, revisions and massive rotator cuff arthropathy, were also very successful; providing overhead range of motion in many patients. Conclusions: Resurfacing hemiarthroplasty, in patients with intact or repairable rotator cuff mechanisms, gave the most satisfactory results and were the least technically complicated to perform, requiring minimal instrumentation. Resurfacing of full proximal humeral deficiencies, using femoral resurfacing components, gave similar clinical results to more complex semi-constrained devices, also with less technical difficulties and simple instrumentation.
References
[1]
Kruger, F.J. (1951) A Vitallium Replica Arthroplasty on the Shoulder: A Case Report of Aseptic Necrosis of the Proximal End of the Humerus. Surgery, 30, 1005-1011.
[2]
Neer, C.S. (1955) Articular Replacement of the Humeral Head. JBJS, 37, 215-228. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-195537020-00001
[3]
Fenlin, J. (1973) Total Glenohumeral Joint Replacement. Medical Clinics of North America, 6, 565-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(20)31018-X
[4]
Cuff, D.J., Pupello, B.G., Santoni, R.T., et al. (2017) Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Deficiency: A Concise Follow-Up at a Minimum of 10 Years, of Previous Reports. JBJS, 99, 1895-1899. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.00175
[5]
Buechel, F.F., Pappas, M.J. and DePalma, A.F. (1978) “Floating Socket” Total Shoulder Replacement: Anatomical, Biomechanical and Surgical Rationale. Journal of Materials Research, 12, 89-114. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820120109
[6]
Buechel, F. and Pappas, M. (1975) Patent # 3,916,451. Floating Socket Joint.
[7]
Buechel, F.F. (1976) Shoulder Replacement in a Chimpanzee. American Journal of Primatology, 6, 274-283. https://doi.org/10.1159/000459759
Pritchett, J.W. (2011) Long-Term Results and Patient Satisfaction after Shoulder Resurfacing. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 20, 771-777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.014
[10]
Worland, R.L. and Arredondo, J. (1998) Bipolar Arthroplasty for Painful Conditions of the Shoulder. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 13, 631-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(98)80005-3
[11]
Arredondo, J. and Worland, R.L. (1999) Bipolar Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients with Osteoarthritis: Short-Term Clinical Results and Evaluation of Birotational Head Motion. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 8, 425-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90071-X
[12]
Buechel, F.F. and Pappas, M.J. (2015) Principles of Human Joint Replacement: Design and Clinical Application. 2nd Edition. Springer, Switzerland, 375-431. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15311-7
[13]
Biocore9 (2020) FDA 510K #K193122. Biocore9 Humeral Head Resurfacing Component.
[14]
Biocore9 (2021) FDA 510K #K201219. Biocore9 Femoral Head Resurfacing Component.