|
实际贡献导向的一流工学学科评价体系研究
|
Abstract:
学科评价是学科建设的“指挥棒”,在“破五唯”背景下探索高校学科评价是当前亟待研究的问题。一流工科建设在“双一流”建设中发挥重要作用,其评价体系对学科实际贡献的重视不足。为引起学界和教育评价工作者对工科实际贡献评价的重视,研究在明晰国内外主流学科评价的内容的基础上充分考虑一流工科应有的基础实力和外部贡献,运用问卷调查法和德尔菲法,从一流师资队伍、拔尖创新人才贡献、科研贡献、社会贡献、基础设施建设五个维度构建实际贡献导向的一流工学学科评价体系,为我国高校一流工科建设提供建议和思路。
Discipline evaluation is the “baton” of discipline construction, and exploring the discipline evaluation of colleges and universities under the background of “breaking the five only” is an urgent issue to be studied at present. The construction of first-class engineering disciplines plays an important role in the construction of “double first-class”, but its evaluation system does not pay enough attention to the actual contribution of the disciplines. In order to draw the attention of academics and educational evaluators to the evaluation of actual contribution of engineering disciplines, the study takes into full consideration of the basic strength and external contribution of first-class engineering disciplines on the basis of clarifying the contents of mainstream disciplinary evaluation at home and abroad, and builds a first-class engineering disciplines evaluation system oriented to the actual contribution by applying questionnaire survey and Delphi method from the dimensions of first-class faculty, contribution of top-notch innovators, contribution of scientific research, contribution of the society, and construction of infrastructures. The evaluation system of engineering disciplines provides suggestions and ideas for the construction of first-class engineering disciplines in China’s colleges and universities.
[1] | 国务院关于印发统筹推进世界一流大学和一流学科建设总体方案的通知[EB/OL]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-11/05/content_10269.htm, 2024-01-04. |
[2] | 教育部财政部国家发展改革委关于印发《统筹推进世界一流大学和一流学科建设实施办法(暂行)》的通知[EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_843/201701/t20170125_295701.html, 2024-01-04. |
[3] | 林健. 面向未来的中国新工科建设[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2017, 38(2): 26-35. https://doi.org/10.14138/j.1001-4519.2017.02.002610 |
[4] | 教育部、财政部、国家发展改革委关于公布第二轮“双一流”建设高校及建设学科名单的通知[EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/s7065/202202/t20220211_598710.html, 2022-02-14. |
[5] | 孙鹤. 我国工学门类学科评价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 天津: 天津大学, 2007. |
[6] | 翟亚军, 王晴. “双一流”建设语境下的学科评估再造[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2017(6): 45-51. |
[7] | 上海交通大学世界一流大学研究中心. 排名方法: 2023世界大学学术排名[EB/OL]. http://www.shanghairanking.cn/methodology/arwu/2023, 2023-12-09. |
[8] | U.S. News (2022) How U.S. News Calculated the 2022-2023 Best Global Universities Rankings. https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/methodology |
[9] | Quacquarelli Symonds (2023) QS World University Rankings 2023: Top Global Universities. https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/worlduniversity-rankings/2023 |
[10] | Times Higher Education (2022) World University Rankings 2022: Methodology. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/worlduniversity-rankings-2022-methodology |
[11] | 中华人民共和国教育部. 第五轮学科评估工作方案[EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/moe_1946/fj_2020/202011/t20201102_497819.html, 2023-12-09. |
[12] | 李燕. 基于大数据的世界一流学科评价体系构建[J]. 高教学刊, 2023, 9(13): 27-30. |
[13] | 袁广林. 专业博士培养目标定位: 研究型专业人员[J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2014(11): 1-5. |