|
衍生数据知识产权保护的理论证成与权利构造
|
Abstract:
衍生数据作为数据要素中的重要组成部分,蕴藏着巨大的经济价值。衍生数据符合劳动赋权理论与创新激励理论,赋予其知识产权保护具备法理基础;从知识产权客体扩张性逻辑以及原型范畴理论来看,衍生数据可因“家族相似性”而纳入知识产权客体体系内,但考虑到衍生数据自身的独特属性,既有的知识产权制度难以对其进行合理的规制,因而需要为衍生数据在知识产权体系内创设新型知识产权即衍生数据专有权。具体而言,该权利的构造需以满足多方利益平衡和促进数据要素市场流通原则,以非独创性、公开性以及来源合法的衍生数据为客体,基本权能包括发布权、使用权、传播权、禁止权。为避免衍生数据权人的权利过分扩张,权利的行使受到保护期限、合理使用制度以及强制许可制度的限制。
Derived data, as an important component of data elements, contains enormous economic value. Derived data conforms to the theories of labor empowerment and innovation incentives, giving it a legal basis for intellectual property protection; from the perspective of the logic of expansion of intellectual property objects and the theory of prototype categories, derived data can be included in the system of intellectual property objects due to “family similarity”. However, considering the unique attributes of derived data itself, existing intellectual property systems are difficult to regulate it reasonably. Therefore, it is necessary to create new types of intellectual property rights, namely exclusive rights to derived data, within the intellectual property system. Specifically, the construction of this right needs to meet the principles of balancing multiple interests and promoting the market circulation of data elements, with unoriginal, public, and legally sourced derivative data as the object. The basic rights include the right to publish, use, disseminate, and prohibit. To avoid excessive expansion of the rights of derivative data rights holders, the exercise of rights is limited by protection periods, fair use systems, and mandatory licensing systems.
[1] | 孙莹. 企业数据确权与授权机制研究[J]. 比较法研究, 2023(3): 56-73. |
[2] | 黄武双, 邱思宇. 数据资源的类型化赋权[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 44(5): 111-121. |
[3] | 吴汉东. 数据财产赋权的立法选择[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2023, 41(4): 44-57. |
[4] | 高阳. 衍生数据作为新型知识产权客体的学理证成[J]. 社会科学, 2022(2): 106-115. |
[5] | 许可. 从权利束迈向权利块: 数据三权分置的反思与重构[J]. 中国法律评论, 2023(2): 22-37. |
[6] | 刘双阳, 李川. 衍生数据的财产属性及其刑法保护路径[J]. 学术论坛, 2020, 43(3): 39-47. |
[7] | 崔国斌. 著作权法原理与案例[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2014: 8-9. |
[8] | 蔡伟钊. 数字经济时代企业数据的法律保护与模式构建[J]. 社会科学家, 2023(12): 86-92. |
[9] | 高宁宁. 企业数据财产权的法律属性界定[J]. 甘肃政法大学学报, 2022(5): 97-110. |
[10] | 陶乾, 李衍泽. 论衍生数据的知识产权保护模式[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 44(4): 94-101. |
[11] | 易继明, 李春晖. 知识产权的边界: 以客体可控性为线索[J]. 中国社会科学, 2022(4): 120-139 207. |
[12] | 和育东. 从权利到功利: 知识产权扩张的逻辑转换[J]. 知识产权, 2014(5): 9-14. |
[13] | 肖冬梅. “数据”可否纳入知识产权客体范畴? [J]. 政法论丛, 2024(1): 137-148. |
[14] | 冯晓青. 知识产权视野下商业数据保护研究[J]. 比较法研究, 2022(5): 31-45. |