|
数字经济下智慧赋能家事审判研究——以“枫桥经验”为完善路径
|
Abstract:
智慧家事审判是数字技术与传统家事诉讼结合的新型场景。基于维护家庭伦理、提高审判效率以及我国司法智慧化改革的现实需要,智慧家事审判具有进一步适用的可行性与必要性。然而,当前智慧家事审判应用仍存在诸多不敷适用之处,尤其表现在智慧家事审判正当程序缺位、人权保障弱化以及数字形式主义加剧等。基于此,规则设计方面,可适当借鉴新时代“枫桥经验”,进行溯源治理,首先为智慧赋能家事审判提供上位法依据;其次,强化弱势群体保护机制;最后通过党建破除智慧化家事审判法庭数字形式主义的不足。
Smart household adjudication represents an innovative fusion of digital technology with traditional family litigation. With the imperative to uphold family ethics, boost judicial efficiency, and propel the smartification reform of China’s judicial system, there exists both feasibility and necessity for further advancing smart household adjudication. However, current implementations of this approach still lack in several aspects, notably in terms of inadequate procedural safeguards, diminished protection of human rights, and the aggravation of digital formalism. In addressing these challenges, it is prudent to draw insights from the “Fengqiao Experience” of the new era and engage in retrospective governance. This entails firstly establishing a legal framework to empower smart household adjudication, secondly enhancing mechanisms to safeguard vulnerable groups, and finally, through party building initiatives, mitigating the shortcomings of digital formalism within smart household adjudication courts.
[1] | 刘艳红. 大数据驱动审判体系与审判能力现代化的创新逻辑及其展开[J]. 东南学术, 2020(3): 122-134 248. |
[2] | 胡佩佩. 从家事审理到家事治理——在线诉讼模式的再造与规制[C]//上海市法学会. 《上海法学研究》集刊(2020年第9卷总第33卷)——民法典婚姻家庭妇女权益保护文集. 2020: 8. |
[3] | 王禄生. 智能技术赋能政法改革的中国图景[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2023, 41(5): 12-31. |
[4] | 高莹. 论智慧法院中的数字正义[J]. 江西社会科学, 2023, 43(8): 159-168. |
[5] | 宋玉茹, 刘诚. 数字营商环境、智慧法院与服务消费[J]. 东北财经大学学报, 2024(1): 24-36. |
[6] | 段厚省. 远程审判的程序正当性考察——以交往行为理论为视角[J]. 政法论丛, 2020(2): 113-126. |
[7] | 郑戈. 在法律与科技之间——智慧法院与未来司法[J]. 中国社会科学评价, 2021(1): 80-92 159. |
[8] | 王世卿. 数字枫桥“易联调”: 生成机理、实践样态及基层治理创新经验[J]. 浙江警察学院学报, 2023(5): 29-38. |
[9] | 景跃进. 数字时代的中国场景: 数字化改革的政治意义[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2023(1): 38-42. |
[10] | 王国龙. 法院参与基层治理及其角色定位[J]. 东岳论丛, 2020, 41(4): 138-148. |