|
试论著作权保护中的“思想与表达二分法”原则
|
Abstract:
思想与表达二分法原则是著作权法中的一项基本原则,该原则自美国明确规定,经各国实践运用后,得到各国司法的普遍认可。我国虽未有明确的法律规定,但在司法实践中对该原则予以适用,在适用过程中发现思想与表达的界限难以区分、立法缺位、独创性标准难以把握以及技术发展带来的新挑战等诸多问题。通过剖析适用中存在的问题,以综合认定区分思想与表达、通过立法完善二分法原则、明确独创性认定标准以及以开放性条款顺应时代发展,由此推进我国立法进程,以期改善我国司法实践。
The dichotomy between thought and expression is a basic principle in copyright law, which has been clearly stipulated in the United States and has been widely recognized by the judiciary of various countries after being applied in practice. Although there is no clear legal provision in China, this principle is applied in judicial practice. However, there are many problems in the application of this principle, such as the difficulty of distinguishing the boundary between thought and expression, the lack of legislation, the difficulty of grasping the standard of originality, and the new challenges brought about by technological development. By analyzing the problems existing in the application, distinguishing ideas and expressions through comprehensive identification, improving the principle of dichotomy through legislation, clarifying the criteria for determining originality, and adapting to the development of the times with open clauses, we will promote the legislative process in China and improve China’s judicial practice.
[1] | [德]布拉德?谢尔曼, [英]莱昂内尔?本特利. 现代知识产权法的演进[M]. 金海军, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2006: 163-164. |
[2] | 吴汉东. 知识产权基础问题研究[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2019: 135. |
[3] | 李雨峰. 版权制度的困境[J]. 比较法研究, 2006(3): 99-106. |
[4] | 李明德. 美国知识产权法[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2003: 139. |
[5] | 殷贵山, 邱立民. 文学作品实质性相似的司法判定方法评析[J]. 出版发行研究, 2017(10): 83-85. |
[6] | 吴汉东. 知识产权多维度学理解读[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2015: 335. |
[7] | 王玥, 许剑飞. 版权法思想、表达二分法及其发展——以利益平衡为分析工具[J]. 南通大学学报(社会科学版), 2008(3): 100-105. |
[8] | 左海峰. 著作权中思想与表达的区分方法及其适用[J]. 吉林工商学院学报, 2016, 32(1): 80-83. |