全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

“双碳”目标下我国碳排放权交易监管法律制度研究
Study on the Legal System of Supervision over Carbon Emission Trading in China under the “Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality” Target

DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2024.125403, PP. 2834-2841

Keywords: “双碳”目标,碳排放权交易,法律监管
“Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality” Target
, Carbon Emission Trading, Legal Supervision

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

通过研究试点省市的管理规章以及新出台的《碳排放权交易管理暂行条例》的具体内容,发现我国碳排放权交易监管制度仍然存在以下问题。一是中央监管立法层级低且地方立法差异大。二是碳排放数据质量监管不足。三是监管主体及职能划分不清。四是违反碳排放权交易的处罚单一且较轻。基于此,结合国内外相关研究和我国具体实际情况,进一步完善我国碳排放权交易监管法律制度。完善碳排放权交易顶层立法设计;制定碳排放数据质量监管实施细则,鼓励碳排放单位信息披露并且规范信息披露报告,提高第三方核查机构准入的门槛加强监管;统一碳排放权交易监管主体明确监管范围;强化碳排放权交易违规处罚规定,丰富处罚种类加大惩处力度,同时引入奖励机制。
By studying the administrative regulations of pilot provinces and cities, as well as the specific content of the newly issued Interim Regulations on Carbon Emission Rights Trading Management, we have identified the following issues in China’s carbon emission rights trading supervision system. Firstly, the level of central regulatory legislation is low and there are significant differences in local legislation. Secondly, there is insufficient supervision of the quality of carbon emission data. Thirdly, the supervision subjects and their functions are not clearly defined. Fourthly, the penalties for violating carbon emission rights trading are monotonous and relatively lenient. Based on these findings, combined with relevant domestic and international research and China’s specific practical situation, we need to further improve China’s legal system for carbon emission rights trading supervision. This includes refining the top-level legislative design for carbon emission rights trading, formulating detailed rules for the supervision of carbon emission data quality, encouraging carbon emission units to disclose information and standardizing information disclosure reports, raising the entry threshold for third-party verification agencies and strengthening supervision, unifying the supervision subjects for carbon emission rights trading and clarifying the scope of supervision, strengthening the regulations on penalties for violations of carbon emission rights trading, enriching the types of penalties and increasing the severity of punishment, and introducing incentive mechanisms at the same time.

References

[1]  王玮. 碳排放交易如何规范? 国常会审议通过的这项条例将提出新要求[EB/OL].
https://m.mp.oeeee.com/a/BAAFRD000020240105897154.html, 2024-02-17.
[2]  江晨晨. 中国碳排放权交易的行政监管制度研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2023.
[3]  张晗, 孟佶贤. 激励约束视角下中国碳市场的碳减排效应[J]. 资源科学, 2022, 44(9): 1759-1771.
[4]  戴彦德, 康艳兵, 等. 碳交易制度研究[M]. 北京: 中国发展出版社, 2014: 5.
[5]  曾繁君. “双碳”背景下碳排放权交易监管法律制度研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 蚌埠: 安徽财经大学, 2023.
[6]  赵奕媛, 康京涛. 碳排放权交易的法律困境与消解[J]. 河北环境工程学院学报, 2024, 34(1): 17-22.
[7]  苗道华. 中国碳排放权交易监管法律制度构建路径探索[J]. 环境工程, 2023, 41(8): 320-321.
[8]  江轩宇, 申丹琳, 李颖. 会计信息可比性影响企业创新吗[J]. 南开管理评论, 2017, 20(4): 82-92.
[9]  沈洪涛. “双碳”目标下我国碳信息披露问题研究[J]. 会计之友, 2022(9): 2-9.
[10]  任洪涛. “双碳”背景下碳排放数据质量监管的制度省思与法治完善[J]. 广西社会科学, 2023(2): 11-19.
[11]  王莉, 闫媛媛. 碳交易第三方核查法律规制的反身法健全路向[J]. 福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 36(2): 86-94.
[12]  美塔乐. 碳排放数据弄虚作假行为法律规制研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古财经大学, 2023.
[13]  杨博文. 明罚敕法: 碳市场数据报告责任追究的罚则设计[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 23(2): 144-156.
[14]  刘英. 我国碳排放权交易市场存在的法律问题及完善建议[J]. 西部学刊, 2022(20): 54-58.
[15]  罗凡. “双碳”目标下碳排放第三方核查机制的制度省思与法治完善[J]. 环境保护, 2023, 51(Z1): 55-58.
[16]  陈国栋. 缔约资格排除类信用惩戒的法治化路径[J]. 现代法学, 2021, 43(1): 105-114.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133