全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

强化多通道功能性电刺激对偏瘫患者下肢运动功能的影响及表面肌电研究
Effects of Enhanced Multi-Channel Functional Electrical Stimulation on Lower Limb Motor Function and Surface Electromyography in Patients with Hemiplegia

DOI: 10.12677/acm.2024.1451495, PP. 809-817

Keywords: 功能性电刺激,脑卒中,下肢,表面肌电图
Functional Electrical Stimulation
, Stroke, Lower Limbs, Surface Electromyography

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:探讨脑卒中偏瘫患者给予强化多通道功能性电刺激(FES)治疗后下肢运动功能的变化及表面肌电研究。方法:选择符合入组标准的60例脑卒中偏瘫患者,随机分为对照组、常规刺激组、强化刺激组,每组20例。3组患者均给予常规药物治疗及康复训练,对照组给予偏瘫肢体运动疗法(PT)训练每次30 min;常规刺激组PT治疗每次30 min,同时予以FES 10 min,一天一次;强化刺激组PT治疗每次30 min,FES 20 min,一天一次。分别于治疗前及治疗后对患者进行Fugl-Meyer运动评定量表中下肢部分(FMA-LE)、TUGT (“起立–行走”计时测试)、步态参数中患者的步长(患侧)和步频进行评定,同时利用表面肌电图测量3组患者治疗前后患侧腓肠肌内侧头中位频率(MF)数值变化。结果:三组患者治疗4周后进行评估,组内比较FMA-LE、TUGT、步长(患侧)、步频、MF数值均较治疗前改善,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。常规刺激组、强化刺激组FMA-LE、TUGT、步长(患侧)、步频、MF数值均较对照组改善,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05);强化刺激组较常规刺激组上述指标改善,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:多通道功能性电刺激可以改善脑卒中偏瘫患者下肢的运动功能,增强肢体抗疲劳性,且通过增加治疗时间下肢运动功能改善更明显,可以将此研究方法广泛应用于临床中。
Objective: To investigate the changes of lower limb motor function and surface electromyogramphy in stroke patients with hemiplegia after intensive multi-channel functional electrical stimulation (FES). Methods: Sixty stroke patients with hemiplegia who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into control group, conventional stimulation group and intensive stimulation group, with 20 cases in each group. The patients in the three groups were given routine drug treatment and rehabilitation training, and the control group was given hemiplegic limb movement therapy (PT) training for 30 min each time. The conventional stimulation group was treated with PT for 30 min each time and FES for 10 min once a day. The intensive stimulation group was treated with PT for 30 min each time and FES for 20 min once a day. Before and after treatment, the lower limb part of Fugl-Meyer motor assessment scale (FMA-LE), TUGT (“standing-walking” timing test), step length (affected side) and step frequency of patients in gait parameters were evaluated. At the same time, surface electromyography was used to measure the median frequency (MF) of the medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle on the affected side of the three groups before and after treatment. Result: After 4 weeks of treatment, the FMA-LE, TUGT, step length (affected side), step frequency and MF values of the three groups were improved compared with those before treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After 4 weeks of treatment, the FMA-LE, TUGT, step length (affected side), step frequency and MF values of the conventional stimulation group and the intensive stimulation group were improved compared with the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05); the above indexes in the intensive stimulation group were improved compared with those in the conventional stimulation group, and the differences were statistically significant (P <

References

[1]  Warlow, C., Sudlow, C. and Dennis, M. (2003) Stroke. The Lancet, 362, 1211-1224.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14544-8
[2]  Stewart, J.D. (2008) Foot Drop: Where, Why and What to Do? Practical Neurology, 8, 158-169.
https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2008.149393
[3]  Wilkinson, I.A., Burridge, J., Strike, P., et al. (2014) A Randomised Controlled Trial of Integrated Electrical Stimulation and Physiotherapy to Improve Mobility for People Less than 6 Months Post Stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 10, 468-474.
https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2014.917125
[4]  刘翠华, 张盘德, 容小川. 步态诱发功能性电刺激结合康复训练对脑卒中足下垂患者的临床疗效[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2014(24): 6882-6884.
[5]  Marquez-Chin, C. and Popovic, M.R. (2020) Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy for Restoration of Motor Function after Spinal Cord Injury and Stroke: A Review. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 19, Article No. 34.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-020-00773-4
[6]  Liberson, W.T. (1961) Functional Electrotherapy: Stimulation of the Peroneal Nerve Synchronized with the Swing Phase of the Gait of Hemiplegic Patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 42, 101-105.
[7]  吕文, 张锦明, 吕政, 等. 表面肌电图在偏瘫患者下肢肌肉动力学分析中的应用[J]. 医学综述, 2020, 26(24): 4883-4886, 4891.
[8]  各类脑血管疾病诊断要点(1995) [J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2013, 12(7): 559.
[9]  谭志梅, 燕铁斌. 基于正常行走模式的功能性电刺激改善脑梗死早期患者偏瘫下肢运动功能的随机对照研究[C]//中国康复医学会. 中国康复医学会第八届全国康复治疗学术年会资料及论文汇编. 2011: 2.
[10]  陈瑞全, 吴建贤, 沈显山. 中文版Fugl-Meyer运动功能评定量表的最小临床意义变化值的研究[J]. 安徽医科大学学报, 2015, 50(4): 519-522.
[11]  Kubicki, A. (2014) Functional Assessment in Older Adults: Should We Use Timed Up and Go or Gait Speed Test? Neuroscience Letters, 577, 89-94.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2014.06.014
[12]  王玉龙, 康复功能评定学[M]. 第2版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 154-400.
[13]  Kavanagh, J.J. (2009) Lower Trunk Motion and Speed-Dependence during Walking. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 6, Article No. 9.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-9
[14]  穆景颂, 倪朝民. 表面肌电图在脑卒中康复评定中的应用[J]. 中国康复, 2009, 24(1): 53-55.
[15]  陈一, 施海涛, 毛岭. 脑卒中患者步态周期各时相中下肢肌肉的表面肌电特点[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019, 25(8): 956-961.
[16]  孙咏虹, 吴冰洁. 丰富康复训练与神经可塑性[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2010, 16(7): 635-637.
[17]  van Bloemendaal, M., Bus, S.A., Nollet, F., Geurts, A.C.H. and Beelen, A. (2021) Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of Gait Training Assisted by Multichannel Functional Electrical Stimulation in Early Stroke Rehabilitation: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 35, 131-144.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968320981942
[18]  Dietz, V. and Sinkjaer, T. (2007) Spastic Movement Disorder: Impaired Reflex Function and Altered Muscle Mechanics. The Lancet Neurology, 6, 725-733.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70193-X
[19]  陈曦, 王强, 张永祥, 等. 不同次数的功能性电刺激治疗对脑卒中偏瘫患者下肢功能的影响[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2015, 37(6): 421-423.
[20]  陈丹凤, 燕铁斌, 黎冠东, 等. 多通道功能性电刺激对脑卒中患者下肢运动功能的影响[J]. 中国康复, 2013, 28(4): 289-291.
[21]  Ha, S.Y., Han, J.H., Ko, Y.J. and Sung, Y.H. (2020) Ankle Exercise with Functional Electrical Stimulation Affects Spasticity and Balance in Stroke Patients. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation, 16, 496-502.
https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.2040780.390
[22]  Smith, G.V., Alon, G., Roys, S.R. and Gullapalli, R.P. (2003) Functional MRI Determination of a Dose-Response Relationship to Lower Extremity Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Healthy Subjects. Experimental Brain Research, 150, 33-39.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1405-9
[23]  Burridge, J.H., Taylor, P.N., Hagan, S.A., Wood, D.E. and Swain, I.D. (1997) The Effects of Common Peroneal Stimulation on the Effort and Speed of Walking: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Chronic Hemiplegic Patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 11, 201-210.
https://doi.org/10.1177/026921559701100303

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133