全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

智慧教室环境下的小学科学课堂问答行为研究
Research on Q&A Behaviors in Primary School Science Classrooms under Smart Classroom Environment

DOI: 10.12677/ces.2024.125302, PP. 408-416

Keywords: 智慧教室,师生问答,小学科学
Smart Classroom
, Q&A between Teachers and Students, Elementary School Science

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

师生问答是课堂教学的重要一环。交互式电子白板、平板电脑等智能设备的加入,革新了传统以言语为媒介的师生问答形式。本研究基于智慧教室环境下小学科学课堂的教学实录,从教师提问方式、教师叫答方式、学生回答类型以及教师理答方式四个方面,从言语和技术两个维度,构建师生问答分析框架,并对5节小学科学课堂的师生问答行为进行分析。结果发现,在智慧教室环境下,教师重视课堂问答。教师提问以言语问答为主,且以封闭性问题居多;叫答方式以群体作答和点名举手学生为主,部分教师有意识使用技术增强叫答环节的趣味性;在学生回答类型方面,基于言语和基于技术的回答各占一半;在教师理答方面,以教师简单表扬、同意学生的说法为主。最后本文结合当前的特征,提出改进策略。
Question-and-answer interactions between teachers and students are a crucial part of classroom teaching. The integration of smart devices such as interactive electronic whiteboards and tablets has revolutionized the traditional verbal-based Q&A format between teachers and students. This study, based on teaching recordings of primary school science classrooms in a smart classroom environment, constructs an analytical framework for teacher-student Q&A interactions from four aspects: teachers’ questioning methods, teachers’ calling-on methods, students’ response types, and teachers’ feedback methods. The analysis covers both verbal and technological dimensions and examines the Q&A behaviors in five primary school science classrooms. The results show that in a smart classroom environment, teachers attach great importance to classroom Q&A interactions. Teachers primarily use verbal questions, with a majority being closed-ended questions. The calling-on methods mainly involve group responses and calling on students who volunteer by raising their hands, while some teachers consciously utilize technology to enhance the fun of this process. In terms of students’ response types, half are based on verbal responses, and the other half utilize technology. In terms of teachers’ feedback, simple praise and agreement with students’ answers are the most common. Finally, the study proposes improvement strategies based on the current characteristics.

References

[1]  张芳芳, 董新良. 小学教师课堂问答行为分析[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2014, 34(2): 36-38.
[2]  黄荣怀. 教育信息化助力当前教育变革: 机遇与挑战[J]. 中国电化教育, 2011(1): 36-40.
[3]  共产党员网. 习近平: 把我国从网络大国建设成为网络强国[EB/OL].
https://news.12371.cn/2014/02/27/ARTI1393505554377363.shtml, 2024-02-18.
[4]  习近平. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗[N]. 人民日报, 2022-10-26(01).
[5]  孙妍. 浅析小学科学课堂提问的有效性[J]. 中国校外教育, 2016(S1): 266.
[6]  魏慧. 巧课堂之问, 促教学之效——初中科学课堂的有效提问策略[J]. 山西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 25(2): 107-108.
[7]  俞峰. 初中科学课堂问答有效性的策略研究[J]. 考试周刊, 2021(8): 1-3.
[8]  顾小清, 王炜. 支持教师专业发展的课堂分析技术新探索[J]. 中国电化教育, 2004(7): 18-21.
[9]  叶立军, 胡琴竹, 斯海霞. 录像分析背景下的代数课堂教学提问研究[J]. 数学教育学报, 2010, 19(3): 32-34.
[10]  朱雪梅, 唐长林. 职初教师与专家型教师课堂提问的差异性研究——以高中地理“绪论”为课例[J]. 中学地理教学参考, 2009(8): 17-21.
[11]  项阳. 小学语文教师理答行为研究——以五位特级教师的课堂教学为例[J]. 江苏教育研究, 2008(16): 23-27.
[12]  胡敏艳, 王民. 基于课例视频的新职教师地理课堂提问行为现状分析研究[J]. 中学地理教学参考, 2023(12): 74-78.
[13]  薛彩霞. 用好课堂提问发展学生思维——基于思维提升的小学语文课堂提问策略研究[J]. 语文建设, 2021(18): 13-16.
[14]  王亚敏, 崔志钰, 崔景贵. 积极课堂提问的策略设计[J]. 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 24(4): 108-114.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133