网络型寻衅滋事罪的认定标准和司法扩张
The Cognizance Standard and Judicial Expansion of the Crime of Seeking Provocation and Causing Trouble on the Internet

随着网络信息技术的快速发展，网络成为人类重要的生活空间，其在为人们提供生产生活便利的同时，也为诸多新型犯罪的滋生与蔓延提供了土壤。其中，网络中寻衅滋事犯罪现象尤为明显突出，对被害人造成严重伤害，对网络空间乃至社会造成恶劣影响。网络空间寻衅滋事罪主要分为辱骂恐吓型与虚假信息型两种，在司法实践中，面对纷繁复杂的案例，司法机关对行为人造成不良后果没有统一的定罪标准，司法解释的定罪标准模糊，并且发现在实践中存在司法机关对此罪侵犯法益认定标准不一致的现象。因此，寻衅滋事罪在司法活动中常常被用以扩张甚至泛化，从而产生一系列司法问题。本文通过对网络型寻衅滋事罪进行实务案例分析，通过研究辱骂恐吓型与虚假信息型的客观方面来研究网络型寻衅滋事罪的司法认定标准以及网络时代下寻衅滋事罪在司法实践活动中有哪些被扩张适用的表现、被扩张适用的弊端，从而在司法活动中精准把握这个罪名，而不使其泛化适用。
With the rapid development of network information technology, the network has become an important living space for human beings, which not only provides people with convenience in production and life, but also provides soil for the breeding and spread of many new types of crimes. Among them, the crime of seeking provocation and causing trouble in the network is particularly prominent, which causes serious harm to the victims and has a serious bad impact on cyberspace and even society. The crime of seeking provocation and causing trouble in cyberspace is mainly divided into two types: abusive and threatening type and false information type, in judicial practice, in the face of numerous and complicated cases, the judicial organs do not have a unified conviction standard for the adverse consequences caused by the actor, and the conviction standard of judicial interpretation is vague, and it is found that in practice there is a phenomenon that the judicial organs are inconsistent in determining the legal interests of this crime. Therefore, the crime of seeking provocation and causing trouble is often used to expand or even generalize in judicial activities, resulting in a series of judicial problems. Through the practical case analysis of the crime of seeking provocation and causing trouble on the network, this paper studies the judicial identification standard of the crime of seeking provocation and causing trouble on the network by studying the objective aspects of the abusive and threatening type and the false information type, as well as the performance and malpractice of the expanded application of the crime in the judicial practice in the network era, so as to accurately grasp this charge in judicial activities without making it widely applicable.