全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

IL-6及补体C1q联合SIC评分对脓毒症早期预警及预后的预测价值
The Role of IL-6 and Complement C1q Combined with SIC Score in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Patients with Sepsis

DOI: 10.12677/acm.2024.1451424, PP. 274-282

Keywords: 脓毒症,白细胞介素-6,补体C1q,SIC评分,早期预警,疾病预后
Sepsis
, Interleukin-6, Complement C1q, SIC Score, Early Warning, Disease Prognosis

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:探讨白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)、补体C1q与脓毒症相关凝血功能障碍(SIC)评分对脓毒症患者早期预警及预后的预测价值。方法:纳入青岛大学附属医院急诊以及重症监护室(ICU)收治的360名研究对象,收集患者的基线资料、实验室检查指标、SIC评分以及患者28 d的存活情况。采用单因素及多因素Logistic回归分析脓毒症早期预警及预后的独立危险因素。绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)评价IL-6、补体C1q及SIC评分单独及联合应用对脓毒症早期预警及预后的预测价值。结果:与非脓毒症组相比,脓毒症组IL-6、PCT、CRP以及SIC评分增高,C1q降低,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。脓毒症幸存组IL-6、C1q以及SIC评分与脓毒症死亡组间差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,IL-6、C1q以及SIC评分是急诊住院以及重症监护室患者早期发生脓毒症的独立危险因素(P < 0.05)。IL-6、C1q以及SIC评分是脓毒症28 d死亡的独立危险因素(P < 0.05)。对于脓毒症患者的早期预警而言IL-6、C1q及SIC评分的AUC分别是0.769、0.743和0.831,其对应的截断值分别为112.41 pg/mL、139.3 mg/L和1.5分。对于脓毒症患者的预后而言IL-6、C1q及SIC评分的AUC分别是0.694、0.697和0.629,其对应的截断值分别为120.81 pg/mL、137.5 mg/L和3.5分。三者联合检测对脓毒症早期预警及预后的预测效能优于三者单独预测,AUC分别为0.877、0.772,P < 0.001。结论:IL-6、C1q以及SIC评分对脓毒症的早期预警及预后有一定预测价值,三者联合应用时预测效能最佳。
Objective: To investigate the predictive value of interleukin-6 (IL-6), complement C1q and sepsis-associated coagulation dysfunction (SIC) score for early warning and prognosis in patients with sepsis. Methods: Three hundred and sixty study subjects admitted to the Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Qingdao University Hospital were enrolled, and baseline data, laboratory indicators, SIC scores, and patient survival within 28 d were collected. Independent risk factors for early warning and prognosis of sepsis were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The predictive value of IL-6, complement C1q, and SIC score alone and in combination for early warning and prognosis of sepsis was evaluated by plotting the subject’s work characteristic curve (ROC curve). Results: IL-6, PCT, CRP, and SIC scores were increased and C1q was decreased in the sepsis group compared to the non-sepsis group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The differences in IL-6, C1q, and SIC scores between the sepsis survivor group and the sepsis death group were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Multifactorial logistic regression analysis showed that IL-6, C1q, and SIC scores were independent risk factors for early onset of sepsis in patients hospitalized in the emergency as well as intensive care units (P < 0.05). IL-6, C1q, and SIC scores were independent risk factors for death from sepsis at 28 d (P < 0.05). For the diagnosis of sepsis patients the AUC of IL-6, C1q and SIC score were 0.769, 0.743 and 0.831, respectively, and their corresponding cut-off values were 112.41 pg/mL, 139.3 mg/L and 1.5 points, respectively. For the prognosis of sepsis patients the AUC of IL-6, C1q and SIC score were 0.694, 0.697 and 0.629, respectively, and

References

[1]  Weng, L., Xu, Y., Yin, P., et al. (2023) National Incidence and Mortality of Hospitalized Sepsis in China. Critical Care (London, England), 27, Article No. 84.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04385-x
[2]  Salom?o, R., Ferreira, B.L., Salom?o, M.C., et al. (2019) Sepsis: Evolving Concepts and Challenges. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 52, e8595.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431x20198595
[3]  Rivers, E.P. and Ahrens, T. (2008) Improving Outcomes for Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Tools for Early Identification of At-Risk Patients and Treatment Protocol Implementation. Critical Care Clinics, 24, S1-S47.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2008.04.002
[4]  邹慧青, 张玲, 王厚照, 等. 不同临床标本微生物检验的阳性率结果对比[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2020, 26(12): 1757-1759.
[5]  Xie, Y., Zhuang, D., Chen, H., et al. (2023) 28-Day Sepsis Mortality Prediction Model from Combined Serial Interleukin-6, Lactate, and Procalcitonin Measurements: A Retrospective Cohort Study. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 42, 77-85.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-022-04517-1
[6]  Li, H., Chen, J., Hu, Y., et al. (2021) Serum C1q Levels Have Prognostic Value for Sepsis and Are Related to the Severity of Sepsis and Organ Damage. Journal of Inflammation Research, 14, 4589-4600.
https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S322391
[7]  Gutiérrez-Pizarraya, A., León-García, M.D.C., De Juan-Idígoras, R., et al. (2022) Clinical Impact of Procalcitonin-Based Algorithms for Duration of Antibiotic Treatment in Critically Ill Adult Patients with Sepsis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy, 20, 103-112.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2021.1932462
[8]  曾举浩, 丁洪光, 钟文宏, 等. SIC评分对脓毒症患者30 d死亡的预测价值[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2022, 34(12): 1263-1267.
[9]  Singer, M., Deutschman, C.S., Seymour, C.W., et al. (2016) The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 315, 801-810.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287
[10]  Rudd, K.E., Johnson, S.C., Agesa, K.M., et al. (2020) Global, Regional, and National Sepsis Incidence and Mortality, 1990-2017: Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. The Lancet, 395, 200-211.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7
[11]  Tanaka, T., Narazaki, M. and Kishimoto, T. (2014) IL-6 in Inflammation, Immunity, and Disease. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 6, A016295.
https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a016295
[12]  Santos, S.S., Carmo, A.M., Brunialti, M.K., et al. (2016) Modulation of Monocytes in Septic Patients: Preserved Phagocytic Activity, Increased ROS and NO Generation, and Decreased Production of Inflammatory Cytokines. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, 4, Article No. 5.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-016-0078-1
[13]  Xu, Y.D., Cheng, M., Shang, P.P., et al. (2022) Role of IL-6 in Dendritic Cell Functions. Journal of Leukocyte Biology, 111, 695-709.
https://doi.org/10.1002/JLB.3MR0621-616RR
[14]  中国医药教育协会感染疾病专业委员会. 感染相关生物标志物临床意义解读专家共识[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2017, 40(4): 243-257.
[15]  Bozza, F.A., Salluh, J.I., Japiassu, A.M., et al. (2007) Cytokine Profiles as Markers of Disease Severity in Sepsis: A Multiplex Analysis. Critical Care, 11, R49.
https://doi.org/10.1186/cc5783
[16]  Ghebrehiwet, B., Hosszu, K.H. and Peerschke, E.I. (2017) C1q as an Autocrine and Paracrine Regulator of Cellular Functions. Molecular Immunology, 84, 26-33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2016.11.003
[17]  Bohlson, S.S., Fraser, D.A. and Tenner, A.J. (2007) Complement Proteins C1q and MBL Are Pattern Recognition Molecules That Signal Immediate and Long-Term Protective Immune Functions. Molecular Immunology, 44, 33-43.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2006.06.021
[18]  Iba, T., Connors, J.M., Nagaoka, I., et al. (2021) Recent Advances in the Research and Management of Sepsis-Associated DIC. International Journal of Hematology, 113, 24-33.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-020-03053-y
[19]  Iba, T., Nisio, M.D., Levy, J.H., et al. (2017) New Criteria for Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy (SIC) Following the Revised Sepsis Definition: A Retrospective Analysis of a Nationwide Survey. BMJ Open, 7, e017046.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017046
[20]  Iba, T., Arakawa, M., Levy, J.H., et al. (2018) Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy and Japanese Association for Acute Medicine DIC in Coagulopathic Patients with Decreased Antithrombin and Treated by Antithrombin. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 24, 1020-1026.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1076029618770273

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133