全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

风险社会下轻罪立法的必然现实与应然转变
The Inevitable Reality and Necessary Transformation of Misdemeanor Legislation under the Risk Society

DOI: 10.12677/ds.2024.105245, PP. 8-14

Keywords: 风险社会,轻罪立法,刑法谦抑性,前科制度
Risk Society
, Misdemeanor Legislation, Criminal Law Modesty, Criminal Record System

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

风险社会以风险为本质特征,轻罪立法是刑法对频发的社会风险积极治理的表现。从《刑法修正案(六)》到《刑法修正案(十一)》,我国的刑法修订都涉及到轻罪设计。国家治理情况、国际治理经验和刑法发展历程都表明轻罪化具有其时代必然性。新罪轻罪的增设并不必然等同于现象立法或者情绪性立法,不应机械地拘泥于刑法的谦抑性要求。在立法和社会层面都应当转变观念,认识到轻罪时代的不同,做出适应性调整。实体法的轻罪化需要程序法予以配合和保障,后者通过“开源节流”可以提高刑法治理效率。轻罪治理常态化是一种高水平的追求目标,但轻罪立法的范围和进程都应当控制在合理限度内。前科制度的推陈出新也是完善风险社会轻罪设计立法化的题中应有之义。
Risk society is characterized by risk, and the legislation of misdemeanors is the active management of frequent social risks. From “Criminal Law Amendment (VI)” to “Criminal Law Amendment (XI)”, China’s criminal law revision all involves the design of misdemeanors. The situation of national governance, the experience of international governance and the development of criminal law all show that misdemeanour has its inevitability in the times. The addition of new misdemeanors is not necessarily equivalent to phenomenon legislation or emotional legislation, and should not mechanically adhere to the modest requirements of criminal law. In the legislative and social level, we should change the concept, recognize the different times of misdemeanors, and make adaptive adjustments. The misdemeanor of substantive law needs the cooperation and protection of procedural law, the latter can improve the efficiency of criminal law governance through “open source and throttle”. The normalization of misdemeanor governance is a high-level goal to pursue, but the scope and process of misdemeanor legislation should be controlled within a reasonable limit. The reform of the criminal record system is also an important part of perfecting the legislation of misdemeanor crime design in risk society.

References

[1]  陈庆安. 《刑法修正案(十一)》的回应性特征与系统性反思[J]. 政治与法律, 2022(8): 108-122.
[2]  刘宪权, 陆一敏. 《刑法修正案(十一)》的解读与反思[J]. 苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 42(1): 32-41.
[3]  乌尔里希?贝克. 风险社会[M]. 何博闻, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2004: 15-22.
[4]  陈家林. 外国刑法: 基础理论与动向研究[M]. 武汉: 华中科技大学出版社, 2017: 13-16.
[5]  郝冠揆. 论轻罪化的三大认识转变[J]. 兰州学刊, 2022(11): 113-126.
[6]  陈兴良. 轻罪治理的理论思考[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2023(3): 3-18.
[7]  冀洋. 我国轻罪化社会治理模式的立法反思与批评[J]. 东方法学, 2021(3): 124-139.
[8]  金鸿浩. 网络犯罪刑法理论范式的体系化变革[J]. 中国法律评论, 2023(3): 112-132.
[9]  卢建平. 轻罪时代的犯罪治理方略[J]. 政治与法律, 2022(1): 51-66.
[10]  韩轶. 刑法更新应坚守谦抑性本质——以《刑法修正案(十一) (草案)》为视角[J]. 法治研究, 2020, 131(5): 49-55.
[11]  徐立, 成功. 轻罪时代前科制度的内在诟病及其应对[J]. 河北法学, 2023, 41(5): 20-42.
[12]  彭文华, 傅亮. 犯罪结构变迁背景下犯罪刑事治理的目标与路径[J]. 中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 39(2): 12-25.
[13]  莫洪宪, 罗建武. 扫黑除恶常态化研究——以《反有组织犯罪法》实施为重点[J]. 中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 38(2): 13-25.
[14]  刘艳红. 犯罪圈均衡化与刑罚轻缓化: 轻罪时代我国刑事立法发展方向[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2024(1): 17-31.
[15]  崔志伟. 积极刑法立法背景下前科消灭制度之构建[J]. 现代法学, 2021, 43(6): 162-179.
[16]  于志刚. 论前科制度的理论根据[J]. 法学家, 2001(6): 74-77.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133