|
顺行交锁髓内钉结合微创内固定系统钢板固定治疗股骨骨折的研究进展
|
Abstract:
近年来,随着我国交通运输业和现代工业的迅速发展,意外事故导致的外伤性骨折发生率呈现上升趋势,同时随着人口老龄化的到来,骨质疏松导致的老年性骨折发生率也逐年上升。股骨是人体最长的管状骨,其骨折是临床上常见严重骨折,多见于年轻患者,大部分是由于外伤所致,如高处坠落、交通事故、暴力致伤等。如果不及时采取有效的治疗措施,骨折处的局部神经与血管就可能会受到损伤,造成患者骨折处不愈合、延迟愈合、骨不连、畸形愈合等不良事件发生率增加,不当的治疗手段引起的患者死亡率可达15%~20%,严重影响骨折术后康复效果和患者生存质量。因此,对股骨骨折患者采取及时有效的治疗措施尤为重要。目前股骨骨折的临床治疗方式包括保守治疗(即非手术治疗)和手术治疗(如外固定治疗、内固定治疗、髓内钉治疗以及全膝关节置换),随着骨科手术治疗技术和内固定材料的不断更新与发展,保守治疗已经逐渐被弃用,手术成为首选治疗方式。本综述主要评估交锁髓内钉与微创内固定系统钢板固定治疗股骨骨折的临床疗效,探讨交锁髓内钉联合微创内固定系统钢板固定治疗股骨骨折的临床应用价值。
In recent years, with the rapid development of transportation industry and modern industry, the incidence of traumatic fracture caused by accidents is on the rise. At the same time, with the arrival of aging population, the incidence of senile fracture caused by osteoporosis is also increasing year by year. Femur bone is the longest tubular bone in human body. Its fracture is a common serious fracture in clinic, which is more common in young patients. Most of it is caused by trauma, such as falling from height, traffic accident, violent injury, etc. If effective treatment measures are not taken in time, local nerves and blood vessels at the fracture site may be damaged, increasing the incidence of adverse events such as nonunion, delayed union, bone nonunion, and malunion. The mortality rate of patients caused by improper treatment methods can reach 15%~20%, seriously affecting the recovery effect after the fracture surgery and the patient’s quality of life. Therefore, it is particularly important to take timely and effective treatment measures for patients with femoral fractures. At present, the clinical treatment of femoral fracture includes conservative treatment (non-surgical treatment) and surgical treatment (such as external fixation, internal fixation, intramedullary nail and total knee replacement). With the continuous renewal and development of orthopedic surgical treatment technology and internal fixation materials, conservative treatment has been gradually abandoned, and surgery has become the preferred treatment. This review mainly evaluates the clinical efficacy of interlocking intramedullary nail and less invasive stabilization system plate fixation in the treatment of femoral fractures, and discusses the clinical application value of interlocking intramedullary nail combined with less invasive stabilization system plate fixation in the treatment of femoral fractures.
[1] | Rupp, M., Walter, N., Pfeifer, C., et al. (2021) The Incidence of Fractures among the Adult Population of Germany—An Analysis from 2009 through 2019. Deutsches ?rzteblatt International, 118, 665-669. |
[2] | 李国胜, 边朝辉, 刘明礼. PFNA与PFN内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2020, 35(2): 169-171. |
[3] | 王汉卿, 楼跃, 王浩然. 交锁髓内钉与锁定加压钢板治疗大龄儿童股骨干骨折的有限元分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(20): 6-10. |
[4] | 信远, 任海东, 吴学业. 交锁髓内钉与钢板内固定在股骨骨折治疗中的效果比较[J]. 中外医疗, 2023, 42(13): 77-80, 85. |
[5] | 黄家谷, 王小勇, 李孛, 等. 交锁髓内钉联合钢板内固定治疗C型股骨干骨折的疗效观察[J]. 骨科, 2022, 13(4): 367-369. |
[6] | 王旻. 交锁髓内钉与钢板内固定治疗股骨骨折的疗效对比分析[J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2021, 27(12): 70-71. |
[7] | 胡靖. 逆行髓内钉和微创内固定系统治疗股骨远端骨折的临床疗效对比[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆医科大学, 2020. |
[8] | Bekos, A., Sioutis, S., Kostroglou, A., et al. (2021) The History of Intramedullary Nailing. International Orthopaedics, 45, 1355-1361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-04973-y |
[9] | Rosa, N., Marta, M., Vaz, M., et al. (2019) Intramedullary Nailing Biomechanics: Evolution and Challenges. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 233, 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411919827044 |
[10] | Deepak, M.K., Jain, K., Rajamanya, K.A., et al. (2012) Functional Outcome of Diaphyseal Fractures of Femur Managed by Closed Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing in Adults. Annals of African Medicine, 11, 52-57. https://doi.org/10.4103/1596-3519.91025 |
[11] | Debrauwer, S., Hendrix, K. and Verdonk, R. (2000) Anterograde Femoral Nailing with a Reamed Interlocking Titanium Alloy Nail. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 66, 484-489. |
[12] | 楚宇鹏, 孔建中, 牟暇平, 等. 交锁髓内钉与LCP内固定治疗胫骨远端骨折的放射学及临床疗效比较[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2010, 25(12): 1080-1082. |
[13] | Herrera, D.A., Kregor, P.J., Cole, P.A., et al. (2008) Treatment of Acute Distal Femur Fractures above a Total Knee Arthroplasty: Systematic Review of 415 Cases (1981-2006). Acta Orthopaedica, 79, 22-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670710014716 |
[14] | Ostrum, R.F., Agarwal, A., Lakatos, R. and Poka, A. (2000) Prospective Comparison of Retrograde and Antegrade Femoral Intramedullary Nailing. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 14, 496-501. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200009000-00006 |
[15] | 宋启威. 逆行和顺行交锁髓内钉治疗股骨干骨折对比观察[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 合肥: 安徽医科大学, 2018. |
[16] | Vandenbussche, E., LeBaron, M., Ehlinger, M., et al. (2014) Blade-Plate Fixation for Distal Femoral Fractures: A Case-Control Study. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 100, 555-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2014.06.006 |
[17] | 纪振伟. 微创内固定系统结合拉力螺钉在股骨髁间粉碎性骨折中的应用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆医科大学, 2015. |
[18] | Schütz, M., Müller, M., Regazzoni, P., et al. (2005) Use of the Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) in Patients with Distal Femoral (AO33) Fractures: A Prospective Multicenter Study. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 125, 102-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0779-x |
[19] | Kao, F.C., Tu, Y.K., Su, J.Y., et al. (2009) Treatment of Distal Femoral Fracture by Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis: Comparison between the Dynamic Condylar Screw and the Less Invasive Stabilization System. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 67, 719-726. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31819d9cb2 |
[20] | 张德春, 周敦, 吕成堂, 等. 动力踝螺钉与微创内固定系统对股骨远端骨折的临床疗效对比[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2019, 37(7): 142-143. |
[21] | 秦荣毫. 微创内固定系统和防旋股骨近端髓内钉内固定治疗老年股骨近端骨折效果比较[J]. 河南外科学杂志, 2020, 26(4): 129-130. |
[22] | 黄淼. 髓内钉联合拉力螺钉与单纯髓内钉治疗AO-C型股骨干骨折疗效对比[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 遵义: 遵义医科大学, 2019. |
[23] | 彭伟君, 高俊, 张瑞彬, 等. 微创经皮钢板固定技术联合微创内固定系统钢板固定治疗老年性股骨远端骨折的临床效果[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(36): 105-107, 110. |
[24] | Li, M., Jiang, Y., Wang, J., et al. (2023) Finite Element Analysis of Different Medial Fixation Strategies in Double-Plate Osteosynthesis for AO Type 33-C2 Femoral Fractures. Injury, 54, S86-S94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2022.01.003 |
[25] | 权毅, 张波, 廖冬发, 等. 动力性交锁髓内钉的设计及生物力学研究[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2003, 19(4): 235-237. |
[26] | 张慧东, 王井伟, 白净. 逆行交锁髓内钉与微创内固定钢板修复股骨远端骨折的生物力学性能比较[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2016, 20(44): 6577-6582. |