算法行政的正当程序风险与法律应对研究
Research on Due Process Risks and Legal Responses of Algorithmic Administration

数字法治政府是数字技术赋能政府治理的新形式，其中一项重要内容就是算法行政，它是新型行政治理模式。算法行政，与传统行政相比，其能够提高程序效率，一定程度上保持行政中立，但也存在新的风险，包括对行政公开、公众参与等正当程序要求的缺失。算法公开、算法审查、算法解释是解决算法行政正当程序问题的重要方式，但这些方式在实际适用中存在困境，为此，需要在利益衡量的基础上进行算法行政公开，以解决利益冲突问题，将法益损害成本降到最低；引入技术性工具对算法进行测试突破算法审查阻碍；明确解释内容和解释标准，提高公众对算法行政的可接受性以及参与程度。
Digital rule of law government is a new form of government governance enabled by digital technology, one of the important contents is algorithm administration, which is a new administrative governance mode. Compared with traditional administration, algorithm administration can improve the efficiency of the procedure and maintain the administrative neutrality to a certain extent, but there are also new risks, including the default of due process requirements such as administrative openness and public participation. Algorithm openness, algorithm review and algorithm interpretation are important ways to solve the problem of algorithm administration due process, but these methods have dilemmas in practical application. Therefore, it is necessary to make algorithm administration open on the basis of interest measurement to solve the problem of interest conflict and minimize the cost of legal interest damage; introduce technical tools to test the algorithm to break through the obstacles of algorithm review; clarify the content and standards of interpretation to improve the public’s acceptance and participation in algorithm administration.