|
基于正交试验的边坡安全系数影响因素敏感性分析
|
Abstract:
为了研究边坡安全系数的影响因素,考虑边坡土体粘聚力、内摩擦角、体积模量、密度、抗拉强度及边坡倾角,采用FLAC3D有限差分软件计算边坡安全系数,在分析模型网格疏密程度对计算结果影响规律的基础上,运用正交试验法对计算结果分析,研究影响边坡安全系数的各因素敏感性。研究结果表明,内聚力、内摩擦角、密度及边坡倾角对边坡安全系数的影响非常显著,敏感性影响程度从大到小依次为:内聚力、内摩擦角、密度、边坡倾角,且内聚力、内摩擦角与安全系数成正相关,边坡倾角、密度与安全系数成负相关;体积模量与抗拉强度对边坡安全系数的影响不显著。经过全长锚固支护后的边坡安全系数从0.96提高到1.22,锚杆支护在提高边坡稳定性方面有较好的效果。
In order to study the influencing factors of slope safety factor, considering the cohesive force of soil mass, internal friction angle, volume modulus, density, tensile strength and slope inclination, FLAC3D finite difference software was used to calculate the slope safety factor. On the basis of analyzing the influence law of model mesh density on the calculation results, orthogonal test method was used to analyze the calculation results. The sensitivity of factors affecting the safety factor of slope is studied. The results show that cohesion, internal friction angle, density and slope inclination have significant effects on slope safety factor, and the degree of sensitivity is as follows from large to small: cohesion, internal friction angle, density and slope inclination, and cohesion and internal friction angle are positively correlated with safety factor, while slope inclination and density are negatively correlated with safety factor. The influence of volume modulus and tensile strength on slope safety factor is not significant. The safety factor of the slope increased from 0.96 to 1.22 after the full length anchorage support, and the bolt support has a good effect on improving the stability of the slope.
[1] | 马毓婷, 陈俊智, 任春芳, 等. 露天矿岩体力学参数对终了边坡稳定性影响敏感性数值模拟[J]. 有色金属(矿山部分), 2022, 74(4): 95-101. |
[2] | 邓文学, 杨天鸿, 南世卿, 等. 司家营铁矿东帮边坡岩体力学参数确定及稳定性分析[J]. 金属矿山, 2016(3): 15-19. |
[3] | 李志辉, 杨小彬, 原文杰, 等. 考虑块石块度及分布的人工土石混合边坡稳定性分析[J/OL]. 金属矿山: 1-11. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/34.1055.TD.20211118.2010.002.html, 2022-09-03. |
[4] | 田刚. 非饱和土边坡稳定性影响因素研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 东南大学, 2022. https://doi.org/10.27014/d.cnki.gdnau.2022.000425 |
[5] | 臧浩, 陈鹏, 赵盾, 等. 基于3DEC的岩质边坡安全系数影响因素敏感性研究[J]. 山东国土资源, 2021, 37(8): 71-77. |
[6] | 王一冰, 朱宝强, 周成, 等. 坡面降雨和坡脚浸泡对土坡影响的模型试验研究[J]. 水利与建筑工程学报, 2020, 18(2): 21-26, 32. |
[7] | 田海, 孔令伟, 李波. 降雨条件下松散堆积体边坡稳定性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(11): 3180-3186. |
[8] | 王建洪, 田明, 邹云丽, 等. 云南地区降雨诱发堆积体边坡失稳的力学机理研究[J]. 水利与建筑工程学报, 2020, 18(4): 204-208 227. |
[9] | 张昊, 余巍伟, 林杭, 等. 不同安全系数对应的边坡滑动面位置分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(2): 449-452. |
[10] | 徐宏, 夏琼, 王旭. 边坡安全系数影响因素敏感性分析[J]. 铁道建筑, 2021, 61(8): 98-101. |
[11] | 黄盛锋, 陈志波, 郑道哲. 基于灰色关联度法和强度折减法的边坡稳定性影响因素敏感性分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2020, 31(3): 35-40. https://doi.org/10.16031/j.cnki.issn.1003-8035.2020.03.05 |
[12] | 董杰华, 黄浩, 徐中来, 等. 基于ABAQUS的坡地边坡稳定性影响因素敏感性分析[J]. 煤炭技术, 2021, 40(1): 62-65. https://doi.org/10.13301/j.cnki.ct.2021.01.017 |
[13] | Zou, G.L., Xu, J. and Wu, C. (2017) Evaluation of Factors That Affect Rutting Resistance of Asphalt Mixes by Orthogonal Experiment Design. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 10, 282-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.03.008 |
[14] | 杨石磊, 郑帅恒, 刘思民, 等. 基于FLAC3D对秘鲁某边坡锚杆支护优化设计分析[J]. 中国水运, 2023(5): 91-93. https://doi.org/10.13646/j.cnki.42-1395/u.2023.05.032 |