门德尔松与雅可比之争：理性抑或信仰？——关于一场启蒙理性之争的分析
The Debate between Mendelssohn and Jacobi: Reason or Faith?—An Analysis of a Debate about Enlightenment Reason

门德尔松与雅可比之间关于斯宾诺莎主义的争论牵涉甚广，无论是从思想史的牵扯广度，还是对后世的影响程度，这场争论都意义重大。本文将从分析雅可比与门德尔松有关“莱辛是否是一位斯宾诺莎主义者”的争论的缘由入手，刻画出这场争论的核心：对于哲学而言，接受理性的后果与接受信仰的后果是什么？对二者采取温和接纳态度的门德尔松的立场意味着什么？本文将表明，从雅可比的视角来看，这一立场的争论结果是：真正的哲学必须清除怀疑主义，而真正的哲学也必须以对上帝的信仰为基础。
The dispute between Mendelssohn and Jacobi about Spinozism was wide-ranging, and it was of great significance both in the breadth of its involvement in the history of thought and the extent of its influence on later generations. This paper will start by analyzing the the debate between Jacobi and Mendelssohn on “whether Lessing is a Spinozist?” and therefore portray the core of this debate: for philosophy, the respective consequences of accepting reason and belief? What were the implications of Mendelssohn’s position, which was moderately accepting of both? The article will show that, from Jacobi’s perspective, the argument for this position is that true philosophy must be purged of skepticism, and true philosophy also must have as its basis faith in God.