全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

销售补贴对企业研发投入和产品定价的影响研究
Research on the Influence of Sales Subsidy on Enterprise R&D Investment and Product Pricing

DOI: 10.12677/mm.2024.144088, PP. 744-752

Keywords: 销售补贴方式,企业研发投入,产品定价,序贯博弈
Sales Subsidy Method
, Enterprise R&D Investment, Product Pricing, Sequential Games

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本文通过构建序贯博弈模型,讨论了疫情背景下政府推出销售补贴政策对于企业的研发投入和产品定价策略的影响。研究发现,自身科研经费的投入能使企业在市场竞争中获得价格优势和提升企业的市场份额,而对手企业科研经费的投入会使得企业被迫降低市场价格和丧失市场份额。当所有企业同时进行科研经费投入时,企业仍可以通过自身的科研经费在一定程度上获得价格优势和提升市场份额,因此,无论对手企业是否进行科研经费的投入,企业都应当加大科研经费的投入力度。无论是定量还是按比例销售补贴,都会削减企业自主研发投入的积极性。因此,本文结论意味着定量和按比例销售补贴都降低了企业的研发投入,企业能在市场竞争的条件下自主地加大自身的研发投入力度。
By constructing a sequential game model, this paper discusses the impact of sales subsidy policies launched by governments on enterprises’ R&D investment and product pricing strategies under the background of the epidemic. The study found that the investment of own scientific research funds can enable enterprises to gain price advantages in market competition and increase their market share, while the investment of rival enterprises’ scientific research funds will force enterprises to lower market prices and lose market shares. When all enterprises invest in scientific research funds at the same time, enterprises can still obtain price advantages and increase market share to a certain extent through their own scientific research funds. Therefore, regardless of whether rival companies invest in scientific research funds, enterprises should increase their research funds. Whether it is quantitative or proportional sales subsidies, it will reduce the enthusiasm of enterprises to invest in independent research and development. Therefore, the conclusion of this paper means that both quantitative and proportional sales subsidies reduce the R&D investment of enterprises, and enterprises can independently increase their own R&D investment under the conditions of market competition.

References

[1]  Guo, D., Guo, Y. and Jiang, K. (2016) Government-Subsidized R&D and Firm Innovation: Evidence from China. Research Policy, 45, 1129-1144.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.002
[2]  严若森, 陈静, 李浩. 基于融资约束与企业风险承担中介效应的政府补贴对企业创新投入的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2020, 17(8): 1188-1198.
[3]  宋砚秋, 齐永欣, 高婷, 王瑶琪. 政府创新补贴、企业创新活力与创新绩效[J]. 经济学家, 2021(6): 111-120.
[4]  张杰, 陈志远, 杨连星, 新夫. 中国创新补贴政策的绩效评估: 理论与证据[J]. 经济研究, 2015, 50(10): 4-17 33.
[5]  楼振凯, 楼旭明, 侯福均. 考虑政府补贴的新产品与再制造产品定价模型[J]. 控制与决策, 2022, 37(1): 196-204.
[6]  尚文芳, 滕亮亮. 考虑政府补贴和销售努力的零售商主导型绿色供应链博弈策略[J]. 系统工程, 2020, 38(2): 40-50.
[7]  黎文靖, 郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(4): 60-73.
[8]  张杰, 郑文平. 创新追赶战略抑制了中国专利质量么? [J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53(5): 28-41.
[9]  冉征, 张玉昌, 郑江淮. 政府创新补贴、知识存量与企业研发投入——基于研发活动不确定性的分析与检验[J]. 中国经济问题, 2023(6): 52-66.
[10]  毛毅翀, 吴福象. 创新补贴、研发投入与技术突破:机制与路径[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2022, 43(4): 26-45.
[11]  毛其淋, 许家云. 政府补贴对企业新产品创新的影响——基于补贴强度“适度区间”的视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2015(6): 94-107.
[12]  宋鹏. 我国政府研发补贴与企业创新绩效及研发能力关联性研究[J]. 软科学, 2019, 33(5): 65-70.
[13]  施建军, 栗晓云. 政府补助与企业创新能力: 一个新的实证发现[J]. 经济管理, 2021, 43(3): 113-128.
[14]  叶红雨, 徐雪莲. 政府补贴对高新技术上市公司创新绩效的门槛效应实证研究[J]. 技术与创新管理, 2018, 39(1): 92-96.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133