|
行政协议单方变更、解除权的法律规制
|
Abstract:
在公私合作愈发普遍的背景下,行政协议已然成为行政主体实现行政管理目标最重要的手段之一。其以柔性、灵活的特点将社会资本与政府强权紧密的结合在一起,以达到更好的社会效果和双方利益。但是目前我国对于行政协议中单方变更、解除权的法律规制并不完善,实践中存在着诸如公共利益设定范围过大、程序性法律规范层级较低、责任承担落实不到位等一系列问题。由此导致政府形象严重受损,行政相对人的缔约积极性下降,双方关系日益紧张,给公共利益与私人利益都造成了不必要的损失。本文通过借鉴国内外优秀的立法经验,尝试从引入专家评审制度、严格界定公共利益等方面入手,为完善单方变更、解除权的法律规制提出一些可行性建议。让社会资本更加积极踊跃地加入到行政管理中来,达到合作共赢的最终目标,真正树立起一个诚实守信、服务为民的政府形象。
In the context of increasingly common public-private cooperation, administrative agreements have become one of the most important means for administrative entities to achieve administrative management goals. It combines social capital and government power closely with its flexible and flexible characteristics to achieve better social effects and mutual interests. However, at present, the legal regulation of unilateral amendment and termination rights in administrative agreements in China is not perfect. In practice, there are a series of problems such as unclear definition of public interests, confusion in determining exercise conditions, and superficial compensation after the fact. As a result, the government’s image has been severely damaged, the contracting enthusiasm of the administrative counterpart has decreased, and the relationship between the two parties has become increasingly tense, causing unnecessary losses to both public and private interests. This article attempts to propose some feasible suggestions for improving the legal regulation of unilateral change and termination rights by drawing on excellent legislative experience both domestically and internationally, starting from the introduction of expert review system and strict definition of public interests. Encourage social capital to actively participate in administrative management, achieve the ultimate goal of cooperation and win-win, and truly establish an honest, trustworthy, and service-oriented government image.
[1] | 冯莉. 论我国行政协议的容许性范围[J]. 行政法学研究, 2020(1): 42-54. |
[2] | Daniel J. Mitterhoff, 杨伟东, 刘秀华. 建构政府合同制度——以美国模式为例[J]. 行政法学研究, 2000(4): 87-97 77. |
[3] | 李颖轶. 论法国行政合同优益权的成因[J]. 复旦学报(社会科学版), 2015, 57(6): 157-164. |
[4] | 孟德斯鸠. 论法的精神[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1961: 154-155. |
[5] | 刘海靖. 浅析行政合同中的行政优益权及其规制[J]. 法制博览, 2013(11): 288. |
[6] | 李吉映. 司法审查视角下的行政优益权限度初探[J]. 东北农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 17(2): 41-46. |
[7] | 胡敏. 试论行政合同单方解除权[J]. 学理论, 2017(2): 135-136. |
[8] | 马怀德. 立法计划未能实现的原因总结[R]. 北京: “中国行政程序法”研讨会, 2015. |
[9] | 张步峰. 正当行政程序研究[M]. 北京: 清华大学岀版社, 2014: 213. |
[10] | 兰桂林. 论行政协议单方变更权的司法审查[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南政法大学, 2018. |
[11] | 张千帆. 公共利益的构成—对行政法的目标以及平衡的意义之探讨[J]. 比较法研究, 2005(5): 5-18. |
[12] | 张旺. 美国的民主政治与决策效率[J]. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2001, 28(6): 59-62. |
[13] | 杨礼宾, 成云雷. 简明廉政文化词典[M]. 济南: 山东省人民出版社, 2015: 56. |
[14] | 王锡锌. 公共决策中的大众、专家与政府——以中国价格决策听证制度为个案的研究视角[J]. 中外法学, 2006, 18(4): 462-483. |
[15] | 李昭. 德法行政合同制度之比较[J]. 河北法学, 2004, 22(3): 121-124. |
[16] | 杰瑞?马肖. 行政国的正当程序[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2005. |
[17] | 将敏感. 行政程序法典化研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2016: 304. |
[18] | 陈新民. 中国行政法学原理[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2002: 42. |